Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MGCvsIWLETF Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. MGC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.05%, versus 0.15% for IWL. MGC is down -3.78% year-to-date (YTD) with -$525M in YTD flows. IWL performs worse with -3.82% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MGC and IWL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MGC vs IWL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MGC IWL | -2.47%-2.58% | -3.06%-3.15% | -3.78%-3.82% | +22.51%+21.93% | +86.97%+86.48% | +84.05%+84.58% |
| Flows | MGC IWL | -$151M-$17M | +$231M+$44M | -$525M+$19M | +$1.48B+$130M | +$2.27B+$464M | +$2.48B+$415M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MGC IWL | +12.07%+12.39% | +18.73%+18.67% | +15.22%+15.27% | +17.34%+17.22% |
| Max drawdown | MGC IWL | -5.32%-5.35% | -13.99%-13.89% | -19.36%-19.22% | -25.79%-25.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | MGC IWL | 60d60d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 707d707d |
MGC | IWL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $241.54 | $164.03 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $243.26 | $165.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MGC | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MGC | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $241.54 | $164.03 |
| 1D performance | -0.71% | -0.70% |
| AuM | $8.97 B | $1.97 B |
| E/R | 0.05% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MGC and IWL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, MGC is down -3.78% year-to-date (YTD), while IWL has lost -3.82%. That puts MGC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MGC or IWL?
Year-to-date, the MGC ETF saw -$525M in flows, compared to +$19M for IWL.
Which ETF is more volatile: MGC or IWL?
Over the past year, MGC had a volatility of 18.73%, while IWL experienced 18.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: MGC or IWL?
As of March 13, 2026, MGC holds $8.97 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWL manages $1.97 B.
What sectors do the MGC and IWL ETFs invest in?
MGC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWL focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the MGC ETF and IWL ETF?
MGC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: MGC or IWL?
MGC holds 175 securities with 52.77% of its assets in the top 15. IWL has 201 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.83%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
