Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MFVLvsQQWZETF Comparison
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) is part of the US Large Cap segment. MFVL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, QQWZ's top sector exposures are Health Care, Energy and Information Technology. MFVL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.49% for QQWZ. MFVL is down -0.18% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. QQWZ performs better with 4.08% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MFVL and QQWZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MFVL vs QQWZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MFVL QQWZ | -1.88%-1.38% | -0.68%+4.30% | -0.18%+4.08% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MFVL QQWZ | +$2M+$3M | +$6M+$19M | +$4M+$4M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MFVL QQWZ | +11.40%+12.17% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MFVL QQWZ | -3.86%-3.54% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MFVL QQWZ | 11d11d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
MFVL | QQWZ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.20 | $26.19 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $20.26 | $26.28 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MFVL | QQWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MFVL | QQWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.20 | $26.19 |
| 1D performance | -0.32% | -0.32% |
| AuM | $6.48 M | $28.89 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.49% |
MFVL | QQWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Motley Fool Asset Management | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Motley Fool Value Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 106 | 98 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2025 | May 7, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MFVL and QQWZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, MFVL is down -0.18% year-to-date (YTD), while QQWZ has returned 4.08%. That puts QQWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MFVL or QQWZ?
Year-to-date, the MFVL ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$4M for QQWZ.
Which ETF is bigger: MFVL or QQWZ?
As of March 12, 2026, MFVL holds $6.48 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQWZ manages $28.89 M.
What sectors do the MFVL and QQWZ ETFs invest in?
MFVL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, QQWZ focuses on Health Care, Energy and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the MFVL ETF and QQWZ ETF?
MFVL top holdings include CHEVRON TEXACO, FEDEX and WALMART INC. QQWZ holds in its top three: NEWMONT CORP, EXXON and GILEAD SCIENCES.
Which ETF is more diversified: MFVL or QQWZ?
MFVL holds 110 securities with 60.94% of its assets in the top 15. QQWZ has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.64%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
