Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MFUSvsFNDXETF Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF (FNDX) is part of the US Large Cap segment. MFUS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, FNDX's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. MFUS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.25% for FNDX. MFUS is up 4.66% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. FNDX performs worse with 3.82% YTD performance, and +$945M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MFUS and FNDX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MFUS vs FNDX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MFUS FNDX | -2.96%-3.23% | +3.33%+2.68% | +4.66%+3.82% | +21.46%+23.39% | +69.29%+70.48% | +79.53%+79.58% |
| Flows | MFUS FNDX | +$6M+$389M | +$12M+$1.22B | +$12M+$945M | +$23M+$2.92B | +$39M+$6.36B | +$85M+$10.20B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MFUS FNDX | +10.73%+10.51% | +15.75%+16.43% | +13.29%+13.43% | +15.09%+15.36% |
| Max drawdown | MFUS FNDX | -2.96%-3.35% | -12.01%-12.73% | -15.37%-16.26% | -18.27%-18.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | MFUS FNDX | 28d28d | 46d52d | 124d131d | 597d545d |
MFUS | FNDX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.23 | $28.26 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $59.31 | $28.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MFUS | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MFUS | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.23 | $28.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | +0.14% |
| AuM | $232.08 M | $23.90 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.25% |
MFUS | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PIMCO | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 796 | 659 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2017 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MFUS and FNDX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MFUS is up 4.66% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDX has returned 3.82%. That puts MFUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MFUS or FNDX?
Year-to-date, the MFUS ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to +$945M for FNDX.
Which ETF is more volatile: MFUS or FNDX?
Over the past year, MFUS had a volatility of 15.75%, while FNDX experienced 16.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: MFUS or FNDX?
As of March 11, 2026, MFUS holds $232.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDX manages $23.90 B.
What sectors do the MFUS and FNDX ETFs invest in?
MFUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, FNDX focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the MFUS ETF and FNDX ETF?
MFUS top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, WALMART INC and BROADCOM LIMITED. FNDX holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: MFUS or FNDX?
MFUS holds 833 securities with 22.33% of its assets in the top 15. FNDX has 691 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.31%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
