Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MFUSvsFNDBETF Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) is part of the US All Cap segment. MFUS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, FNDB's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. MFUS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.25% for FNDB. MFUS is up 4.66% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. FNDB performs worse with 3.83% YTD performance, and +$57M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MFUS and FNDB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MFUS vs FNDB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MFUS FNDB | -2.96%-3.43% | +3.33%+2.50% | +4.66%+3.83% | +21.46%+23.22% | +69.29%+68.49% | +79.53%+75.61% |
| Flows | MFUS FNDB | +$6M+$24M | +$12M+$68M | +$12M+$57M | +$23M+$87M | +$39M+$321M | +$85M+$479M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MFUS FNDB | +10.73%+10.86% | +15.75%+16.73% | +13.29%+13.76% | +15.09%+15.66% |
| Max drawdown | MFUS FNDB | -2.96%-3.52% | -12.01%-12.93% | -15.37%-16.85% | -18.27%-19.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | MFUS FNDB | 28d28d | 46d52d | 124d213d | 597d546d |
MFUS | FNDB | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.23 | $27.58 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $59.31 | $27.55 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MFUS | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MFUS | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.23 | $27.58 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | +0.11% |
| AuM | $232.08 M | $1.14 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.25% |
MFUS | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PIMCO | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index |
| N° of holdings | 796 | 1290 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2017 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MFUS and FNDB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MFUS is up 4.66% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDB has returned 3.83%. That puts MFUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MFUS or FNDB?
Year-to-date, the MFUS ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to +$57M for FNDB.
Which ETF is more volatile: MFUS or FNDB?
Over the past year, MFUS had a volatility of 15.75%, while FNDB experienced 16.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: MFUS or FNDB?
As of March 11, 2026, MFUS holds $232.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDB manages $1.14 B.
What sectors do the MFUS and FNDB ETFs invest in?
MFUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, FNDB focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the MFUS ETF and FNDB ETF?
MFUS top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, WALMART INC and BROADCOM LIMITED. FNDB holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: MFUS or FNDB?
MFUS holds 833 securities with 22.33% of its assets in the top 15. FNDB has 1372 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.76%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
