MFSGvsNBGXETF Comparison
MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) and Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Finance. MFSG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 2.83% for NBGX. MFSG is up 2.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$169M in YTD flows. NBGX performs worse with 1.62% YTD performance, and +$683K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MFSG and NBGX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MFSG vs NBGX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MFSG NBGX | -1.85%-2.24% | -1.28%-0.10% | +2.39%+1.62% | +6.54%+6.17% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MFSG NBGX | +$18M- | +$70M- | +$169M+$683K | +$206M+$1M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MFSG NBGX | +18.88%+15.38% | +17.78%+15.13% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MFSG NBGX | -6.21%-5.49% | -16.18%-14.92% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MFSG NBGX | 53d56d | 177d184d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
MFSG | NBGX | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 2:32 PM | $28.45 | $28.42 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $28.82 | $28.42 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
MFSG | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.45 | $28.42 |
| 1D performance | -1.30% | -0.00% |
| AuM | $354.59 M | $14.22 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 2.83% |
MFSG | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | MFS | Neuberger Berman |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 64 | 51 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 4, 2024 | December 18, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
