Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MFSGvsNBGXETF Comparison
MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) and Neuberger Berman Growth ETF (NBGX) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. MFSG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 2.83% for NBGX. MFSG is down -4.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$68M in YTD flows. NBGX performs better with -4.25% YTD performance, and +$683K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MFSG and NBGX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MFSG vs NBGX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MFSG NBGX | -2.32%-1.07% | -5.57%-5.18% | -4.74%-4.25% | +18.99%+20.24% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MFSG NBGX | +$51M- | +$83M+$1M | +$68M+$683K | +$183M+$2M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MFSG NBGX | +16.93%+13.70% | +21.83%+20.57% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MFSG NBGX | -7.56%-6.49% | -14.82%-14.35% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MFSG NBGX | 63d57d | 45d37d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
MFSG | NBGX | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 2:25 PM | $26.53 | $26.72 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $26.89 | $26.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
MFSG | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.53 | $26.72 |
| 1D performance | -1.33% | -0.00% |
| AuM | $234.94 M | $13.40 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 2.83% |
MFSG | NBGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | MFS | Neuberger Berman |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 45 | 44 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 4, 2024 | December 18, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MFSG and NBGX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, MFSG is down -4.74% year-to-date (YTD), while NBGX has lost -4.25%. That puts NBGX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MFSG or NBGX?
Year-to-date, the MFSG ETF saw +$68M in flows, compared to +$683K for NBGX.
Which ETF is more volatile: MFSG or NBGX?
Over the past year, MFSG had a volatility of 21.83%, while NBGX experienced 20.57%.
Which ETF is bigger: MFSG or NBGX?
As of March 10, 2026, MFSG holds $234.94 M in assets under management (AUM), while NBGX manages $13.40 M.
What sectors do the MFSG and NBGX ETFs invest in?
MFSG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, NBGX focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the MFSG ETF and NBGX ETF?
MFSG top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. NBGX holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: MFSG or NBGX?
MFSG holds 48 securities with 70.09% of its assets in the top 15. NBGX has 45 securities and a top 15 weight of 69.76%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
