MFEMvsEMGFETF Comparison
ETF 1
MFEM
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Uncategorized Equities
-1.52%
VS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF (EMGF) is part of the EM Large & Mid Cap segment. MFEM's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, EMGF's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. MFEM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.26% for EMGF. MFEM is up 22.2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. EMGF performs worse with 19.93% YTD performance, and +$292M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MFEM and EMGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MFEM vs EMGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MFEM EMGF | -1.74%-3.26% | +3.14%-1.57% | +22.20%+19.93% | +28.93%+25.20% | +75.25%+87.60% | +47.97%+59.65% |
| Flows | MFEM EMGF | -- | +$6M+$43M | +$16M+$292M | +$16M+$343M | +$15M+$735M | -$27M+$784M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MFEM EMGF | +19.17%+21.03% | +21.09%+22.85% | +16.05%+17.58% | +15.49%+16.80% |
| Max drawdown | MFEM EMGF | -7.04%-7.38% | -16.28%-14.42% | -17.06%-16.15% | -30.51%-26.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | MFEM EMGF | 12d19d | 134d114d | 247d220d | 987d902d |
Trading data
MFEM | EMGF | |
Last sale 10/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.75 | $68.54 |
| Previous close 10/14/2026 | $28.05 | $68.99 |
| Consolidated volume 10/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MFEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MFEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.75 | $68.54 |
| 1D performance | -1.09% | -0.65% |
| AuM | $154.75 M | $1.86 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
MFEM | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PIMCO | iShares |
| Benchmark | RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Index | STOXX Emerging Markets Equity Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 674 | 654 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2017 | December 8, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MFEM
Taiwan
24.98%
China
23.31%
Republic of Korea
19.65%
Other
32.06%
EMGF
Taiwan
25.59%
China
20.53%
Republic of Korea
20.45%
India
12.33%
Other
21.1%
Sectors
MFEM
Technology
30.05%
Finance
17.7%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.02%
Industrials
8.67%
Energy
8.44%
Other
20.12%
EMGF
Technology
41.04%
Finance
21.08%
Industrials
7.52%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.05%
Other
16.23%
Diversification
MFEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.94%
EMGF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.22%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MFEM
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
2.34%
MediaTek, Inc.
2.12%
Hyundai Motor Co.
2.05%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.95%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
1.72%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
1.65%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.38%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.35%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.32%
Unimicron Technology Corp.
1.25%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
1.24%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
1.18%
Nan Ya Plastics Corp.
1.18%
Accton Technology Corp.
1.15%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
1.06%
EMGF
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
10.31%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
6.80%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.51%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.72%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
1.96%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.50%
China Construction Bank Corp.
1.02%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.00%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
0.76%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.66%
SK Square Co. Ltd.
0.65%
Bank of China Ltd.
0.62%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.61%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
0.56%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
0.55%
Frequently asked questions about MFEM and EMGF
How have the MFEM and EMGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 14, 2026, MFEM is up 22.2% year-to-date (YTD), while EMGF has returned 19.93%. That puts MFEM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MFEM or EMGF?
Year-to-date, the MFEM ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to +$292M for EMGF.
Which ETF is more volatile: MFEM or EMGF?
Over the past year, MFEM had a volatility of 21.09%, while EMGF experienced 22.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: MFEM or EMGF?
As of October 14, 2026, MFEM holds $154.75 M in assets under management (AUM), while EMGF manages $1.86 B.
What sectors do the MFEM and EMGF ETFs invest in?
MFEM leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, EMGF focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MFEM ETF and EMGF ETF?
MFEM top holdings include ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd., MediaTek, Inc. and Hyundai Motor Co.. EMGF holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MFEM or EMGF?
MFEM holds 675 securities with 22.94% of its assets in the top 15. EMGF has 671 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.22%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
