Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MFDXvsQINTETF Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. MFDX's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Materials. In contrast, QINT's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. MFDX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.39% for QINT. MFDX is up 3.56% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. QINT performs better with 3.64% YTD performance, and +$74M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MFDX and QINT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MFDX vs QINT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MFDX QINT | -5.42%-5.38% | +5.15%+4.18% | +3.56%+3.64% | +27.67%+31.35% | +64.28%+74.89% | +62.06%+55.63% |
| Flows | MFDX QINT | -+$13M | -+$87M | -+$74M | +$36M+$180M | +$168M+$196M | +$222M+$292M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MFDX QINT | +13.68%+14.31% | +14.23%+15.89% | +12.84%+13.87% | +14.68%+15.64% |
| Max drawdown | MFDX QINT | -7.42%-6.37% | -11.25%-13.48% | -11.25%-13.48% | -25.97%-33.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | MFDX QINT | 11d14d | 35d37d | 35d37d | 700d932d |
MFDX | QINT | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.56 | $64.46 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $40.02 | $65.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MFDX | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MFDX | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.56 | $64.46 |
| 1D performance | -1.15% | -1.32% |
| AuM | $421.41 M | $530.24 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.39% |
MFDX | QINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PIMCO | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Dev. ex-US Index | Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 1129 | 344 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2017 | September 10, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MFDX and QINT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, MFDX is up 3.56% year-to-date (YTD), while QINT has returned 3.64%. That puts QINT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MFDX or QINT?
Year-to-date, the MFDX ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$74M for QINT.
Which ETF is more volatile: MFDX or QINT?
Over the past year, MFDX had a volatility of 14.23%, while QINT experienced 15.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: MFDX or QINT?
As of March 12, 2026, MFDX holds $421.41 M in assets under management (AUM), while QINT manages $530.24 M.
What sectors do the MFDX and QINT ETFs invest in?
MFDX leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Materials. Meanwhile, QINT focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the MFDX ETF and QINT ETF?
MFDX top holdings include BANCO SANTANDER SA, BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO and NOVARTIS. QINT holds in its top three: HSBC HOLDINGS, BNP PARIBAS and RIO TINTO.
Which ETF is more diversified: MFDX or QINT?
MFDX holds 1192 securities with 10.73% of its assets in the top 15. QINT has 365 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.86%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
