Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MFDXvsINTFETF Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and iShares International Equity Factor ETF (INTF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. MFDX's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Materials. In contrast, INTF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. MFDX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.16% for INTF. MFDX is up 3.56% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. INTF performs worse with 2.54% YTD performance, and +$136M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MFDX and INTF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MFDX vs INTF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MFDX INTF | -5.42%-5.58% | +5.15%+4.23% | +3.56%+2.54% | +27.67%+27.82% | +64.28%+68.59% | +62.06%+61.80% |
| Flows | MFDX INTF | -+$49M | -+$169M | -+$136M | +$36M+$1.27B | +$168M+$1.48B | +$222M+$1.62B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MFDX INTF | +13.68%+14.93% | +14.23%+15.97% | +12.84%+14.03% | +14.68%+15.41% |
| Max drawdown | MFDX INTF | -7.42%-7.35% | -11.25%-13.30% | -11.25%-13.30% | -25.97%-29.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | MFDX INTF | 11d11d | 35d37d | 35d37d | 700d872d |
MFDX | INTF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.56 | $38.33 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $40.02 | $38.77 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MFDX | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MFDX | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.56 | $38.33 |
| 1D performance | -1.15% | -1.13% |
| AuM | $421.41 M | $3.10 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.16% |
MFDX | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PIMCO | iShares |
| Benchmark | RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Dev. ex-US Index | STOXX International Equity Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 1129 | 444 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2017 | April 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MFDX and INTF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, MFDX is up 3.56% year-to-date (YTD), while INTF has returned 2.54%. That puts MFDX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MFDX or INTF?
Year-to-date, the MFDX ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$136M for INTF.
Which ETF is more volatile: MFDX or INTF?
Over the past year, MFDX had a volatility of 14.23%, while INTF experienced 15.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: MFDX or INTF?
As of March 12, 2026, MFDX holds $421.41 M in assets under management (AUM), while INTF manages $3.10 B.
What sectors do the MFDX and INTF ETFs invest in?
MFDX leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Materials. Meanwhile, INTF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the MFDX ETF and INTF ETF?
MFDX top holdings include BANCO SANTANDER SA, BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO and NOVARTIS. INTF holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, NOVARTIS and ROCHE.
Which ETF is more diversified: MFDX or INTF?
MFDX holds 1192 securities with 10.73% of its assets in the top 15. INTF has 469 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.12%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
