Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MFDXvsFDEVETF Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Fidelity International Multifactor ETF (FDEV) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. MFDX's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Materials. In contrast, FDEV's top sector exposures are Financials, Materials and Industrials. MFDX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.2% for FDEV. MFDX is up 5.23% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. FDEV performs worse with 3.91% YTD performance, and +$25M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MFDX and FDEV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MFDX vs FDEV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MFDX FDEV | -4.88%-3.77% | +6.29%+5.51% | +5.23%+3.91% | +30.48%+27.31% | +66.93%+59.73% | +64.96%+50.92% |
| Flows | MFDX FDEV | -+$7M | -+$32M | -+$25M | +$36M+$111M | +$168M+$195M | +$222M+$205M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MFDX FDEV | +13.29%+11.40% | +14.14%+12.76% | +12.81%+11.22% | +14.66%+12.62% |
| Max drawdown | MFDX FDEV | -6.35%-5.76% | -11.25%-9.93% | -11.25%-9.93% | -25.97%-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | MFDX FDEV | 10d10d | 35d29d | 35d29d | 700d1037d |
MFDX | FDEV | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.02 | $35.67 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $40.48 | $36.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MFDX | FDEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MFDX | FDEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.02 | $35.67 |
| 1D performance | -1.13% | -1.45% |
| AuM | $428.19 M | $262.63 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.2% |
MFDX | FDEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PIMCO | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Dev. ex-US Index | Fidelity International Multifactor Index |
| N° of holdings | 1129 | 198 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2017 | February 26, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MFDX and FDEV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MFDX is up 5.23% year-to-date (YTD), while FDEV has returned 3.91%. That puts MFDX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MFDX or FDEV?
Year-to-date, the MFDX ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$25M for FDEV.
Which ETF is more volatile: MFDX or FDEV?
Over the past year, MFDX had a volatility of 14.14%, while FDEV experienced 12.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: MFDX or FDEV?
As of March 11, 2026, MFDX holds $428.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while FDEV manages $262.63 M.
What sectors do the MFDX and FDEV ETFs invest in?
MFDX leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Materials. Meanwhile, FDEV focuses on Financials, Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MFDX ETF and FDEV ETF?
MFDX top holdings include BANCO SANTANDER SA, BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO and NOVARTIS. FDEV holds in its top three: FRESNILLO PLC, PSP SWISS PROPERTY and KINROSS GOLD.
Which ETF is more diversified: MFDX or FDEV?
MFDX holds 1192 securities with 10.73% of its assets in the top 15. FDEV has 207 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.13%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
