MEMXvsXCEMETF Comparison
VS
Matthews Emerging Markets ex China Active ETF (MEMX) and Columbia EM ex-China ETF (XCEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. MEMX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.16% for XCEM. MEMX is up 27.72% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. XCEM performs better with 33.87% YTD performance, and +$356M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MEMX and XCEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MEMX vs XCEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MEMX XCEM | +4.12%+6.13% | -3.39%-2.90% | +27.72%+33.87% | +47.75%+55.21% | +88.62%+95.81% | n/a+71.61% |
| Flows | MEMX XCEM | -+$15M | +$5M+$111M | +$9M+$356M | +$9M+$293M | +$28M+$921M | -+$1.25B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MEMX XCEM | +29.15%+32.31% | +22.89%+25.48% | +16.83%+18.47% | n/a+17.17% |
| Max drawdown | MEMX XCEM | -15.84%-17.06% | -15.84%-17.06% | -17.29%-17.68% | n/a-28.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | MEMX XCEM | 70d70d | 70d70d | 251d251d | n/a1016d |
Trading data
MEMX | XCEM | |
Last sale 9/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.81 | $50.85 |
| Previous close 08/31/2026 | $48.03 | $51.13 |
| Consolidated volume 08/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MEMX
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMEMX | XCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MEMX | XCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.81 | $50.85 |
| 1D performance | -0.45% | -0.55% |
| AuM | $54.46 M | $2.08 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.16% |
Characteristics
MEMX | XCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matthews Asia | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI Beta Thematic Emerging Markets ex-China Index |
| N° of holdings | 70 | 476 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 11, 2023 | September 2, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MEMX
Taiwan
26.04%
Republic of Korea
23.92%
India
11.43%
Brazil
7.29%
Other
31.32%
XCEM
Taiwan
34.59%
Republic of Korea
24.73%
India
14.65%
Other
26.03%
Sectors
MEMX
Technology
38.69%
Finance
26.02%
Other
35.29%
XCEM
Technology
46.42%
Finance
19.72%
Industrials
8.61%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.92%
Other
17.33%
Diversification
MEMX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.38%
XCEM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MEMX
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
9.56%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
7.88%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.05%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.73%
MediaTek, Inc.
2.45%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
1.63%
Itaú Unibanco Holding SA
1.61%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
1.56%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
1.52%
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura SAA
1.50%
Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd.
1.48%
International Container Terminal Services, Inc.
1.45%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
1.43%
KB Financial Group, Inc.
1.28%
KrungThai Card Public Co. Ltd.
1.26%
XCEM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
15.17%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
9.05%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.35%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.41%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.38%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
1.07%
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
1.03%
ICICI Bank Ltd.
0.90%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
0.89%
US19766H2397
0.88%
HDFC Bank Ltd.
0.85%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
0.84%
International Holding Co. PJSC
0.83%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
0.81%
Unimicron Technology Corp.
0.74%
Frequently asked questions about MEMX and XCEM
How have the MEMX and XCEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 31, 2026, MEMX is up 27.72% year-to-date (YTD), while XCEM has returned 33.87%. That puts XCEM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MEMX or XCEM?
Year-to-date, the MEMX ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$356M for XCEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: MEMX or XCEM?
Over the past year, MEMX had a volatility of 22.89%, while XCEM experienced 25.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: MEMX or XCEM?
As of August 31, 2026, MEMX holds $54.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while XCEM manages $2.08 B.
What sectors do the MEMX and XCEM ETFs invest in?
MEMX leans toward sectors like Technology and Finance. Meanwhile, XCEM focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MEMX ETF and XCEM ETF?
MEMX top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. XCEM holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MEMX or XCEM?
MEMX holds 71 securities with 43.38% of its assets in the top 15. XCEM has 479 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.2%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MEMX & XCEM
Advertisement
