MDYGvsXMHQETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. MDYG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, XMHQ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Finance. MDYG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.31% for XMHQ. MDYG is up 19.23% year-to-date (YTD) with -$23M in YTD flows. XMHQ performs worse with 15.64% YTD performance, and -$206M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MDYG and XMHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MDYG vs XMHQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MDYG XMHQ | -0.46%+2.98% | +4.41%+7.85% | +19.23%+15.64% | +24.94%+17.53% | +52.84%+50.37% | +47.19%+66.46% |
| Flows | MDYG XMHQ | +$10M-$53M | +$25M-$97M | -$23M-$206M | -$23M-$83M | -$13M+$3.19B | +$341M+$3.99B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MDYG XMHQ | +18.32%+14.13% | +17.73%+15.26% | +18.92%+18.52% | +20.73%+20.61% |
| Max drawdown | MDYG XMHQ | -6.04%-5.06% | -9.91%-8.74% | -25.46%-24.40% | -29.25%-25.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | MDYG XMHQ | 36d27d | 45d116d | 379d415d | 834d597d |
Trading data
MDYG | XMHQ | |
Last sale 8/6/2026 at 3:39 PM | $110.65 | $117.31 |
| Previous close 08/05/2026 | $109.89 | $118.05 |
| Consolidated volume 08/05/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MDYG | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/6/2026 at 3:39 PM
Live
Closed
MDYG | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $110.65 | $117.31 |
| 1D performance | +0.69% | -0.63% |
| AuM | $2.88 B | $5.60 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.31% |
Characteristics
MDYG | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index |
| N° of holdings | 244 | 80 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 8, 2005 | December 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MDYG
USA
94.7%
Other
5.3%
XMHQ
USA
92.89%
Other
7.11%
Sectors
MDYG
Industrials
22.33%
Technology
21.55%
Healthcare
13.25%
Finance
13.12%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.78%
Other
19.98%
XMHQ
Industrials
22.9%
Healthcare
16.56%
Finance
15.44%
Technology
12.76%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.25%
Other
21.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
MDYG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.48%
XMHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.1%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
MDYG
Twilio, Inc.
1.65%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.61%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
1.47%
nVent Electric Plc
1.44%
ATI, Inc.
1.42%
TechnipFMC plc
1.39%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.36%
MasTec, Inc.
1.35%
Woodward, Inc.
1.33%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
1.31%
Everpure, Inc.
1.31%
XPO, Inc.
1.27%
United Therapeutics Corp.
1.21%
Okta, Inc.
1.21%
RB Global, Inc.
1.14%
XMHQ
TechnipFMC plc
3.82%
Illumina, Inc.
3.73%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
3.41%
nVent Electric Plc
3.19%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
3.15%
Everpure, Inc.
3.02%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
2.94%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.87%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.73%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.48%
Evercore, Inc.
2.44%
Carlisle Cos., Inc.
2.43%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
2.07%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.92%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.91%
Frequently asked questions about MDYG and XMHQ
How have the MDYG and XMHQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 5, 2026, MDYG is up 19.23% year-to-date (YTD), while XMHQ has returned 15.64%. That puts MDYG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MDYG or XMHQ?
Year-to-date, the MDYG ETF saw -$23M in flows, compared to -$206M for XMHQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: MDYG or XMHQ?
Over the past year, MDYG had a volatility of 17.73%, while XMHQ experienced 15.26%.
Which ETF is bigger: MDYG or XMHQ?
As of August 5, 2026, MDYG holds $2.88 B in assets under management (AUM), while XMHQ manages $5.60 B.
What sectors do the MDYG and XMHQ ETFs invest in?
MDYG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, XMHQ focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the MDYG ETF and XMHQ ETF?
MDYG top holdings include Twilio, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp. and Curtiss-Wright Corp.. XMHQ holds in its top three: TechnipFMC plc, Illumina, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MDYG or XMHQ?
MDYG holds 244 securities with 20.48% of its assets in the top 15. XMHQ has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.1%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
