MDYGvsXMHQETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. MDYG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, XMHQ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Healthcare. MDYG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.31% for XMHQ. MDYG is up 12.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$78M in YTD flows. XMHQ performs better with 17.31% YTD performance, and -$115M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MDYG and XMHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MDYG vs XMHQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MDYG XMHQ | -3.07%+5.61% | -4.20%+3.16% | +12.35%+17.31% | +13.65%+17.55% | +57.15%+61.76% | +30.71%+61.36% |
| Flows | MDYG XMHQ | +$42M+$47M | +$85M+$95M | +$78M-$115M | +$105M-$190M | +$64M+$2.66B | +$464M+$4.06B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MDYG XMHQ | +15.07%+12.36% | +17.67%+14.65% | +18.86%+18.17% | +20.76%+20.44% |
| Max drawdown | MDYG XMHQ | -10.14%-6.74% | -10.14%-8.39% | -25.46%-24.40% | -29.25%-25.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | MDYG XMHQ | 77d78d | 77d102d | 379d415d | 834d597d |
Trading data
MDYG | XMHQ | |
Last sale 11/3/2026 at 2:30 PM | $104.47 | $120.20 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $103.30 | $119.81 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MDYG | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/3/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
MDYG | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $104.47 | $120.20 |
| 1D performance | +1.13% | +0.33% |
| AuM | $2.81 B | $5.77 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.31% |
Characteristics
MDYG | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index |
| N° of holdings | 247 | 78 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 8, 2005 | December 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MDYG
USA
94.63%
Other
5.37%
XMHQ
USA
92.21%
Other
7.79%
Sectors
MDYG
Technology
21.77%
Industrials
19.09%
Healthcare
15.65%
Finance
14.45%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.29%
Other
19.74%
XMHQ
Industrials
22.59%
Finance
16.68%
Healthcare
14.41%
Technology
12.88%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.51%
Energy
7.92%
Other
15.02%
Advertisement
Diversification
MDYG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.18%
XMHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.71%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
MDYG
Twilio, Inc.
2.52%
Okta, Inc.
1.95%
TechnipFMC plc
1.50%
nVent Electric Plc
1.46%
ATI, Inc.
1.45%
United Therapeutics Corp.
1.31%
XPO, Inc.
1.16%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.16%
Roku, Inc.
1.13%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
1.13%
Royal Gold, Inc.
1.12%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
1.11%
Woodward, Inc.
1.09%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.08%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
1.02%
XMHQ
TechnipFMC plc
4.61%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
3.78%
nVent Electric Plc
3.46%
Exelixis, Inc.
3.36%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
3.33%
United Therapeutics Corp.
2.69%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.67%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
2.26%
Carlisle Cos., Inc.
2.25%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
2.15%
Evercore, Inc.
2.06%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
2.05%
DocuSign, Inc.
2.04%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.02%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
1.97%
Frequently asked questions about MDYG and XMHQ
How have the MDYG and XMHQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, MDYG is up 12.35% year-to-date (YTD), while XMHQ has returned 17.31%. That puts XMHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MDYG or XMHQ?
Year-to-date, the MDYG ETF saw +$78M in flows, compared to -$115M for XMHQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: MDYG or XMHQ?
Over the past year, MDYG had a volatility of 17.67%, while XMHQ experienced 14.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: MDYG or XMHQ?
As of November 2, 2026, MDYG holds $2.81 B in assets under management (AUM), while XMHQ manages $5.77 B.
What sectors do the MDYG and XMHQ ETFs invest in?
MDYG leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, XMHQ focuses on Industrials, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the MDYG ETF and XMHQ ETF?
MDYG top holdings include Twilio, Inc., Okta, Inc. and TechnipFMC plc. XMHQ holds in its top three: TechnipFMC plc, Medpace Holdings, Inc. and nVent Electric Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: MDYG or XMHQ?
MDYG holds 247 securities with 20.18% of its assets in the top 15. XMHQ has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.71%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
