Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MCOWvsXMMOETF Comparison
Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. MCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, XMMO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. MCOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.35% for XMMO. MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. XMMO performs better with 3.27% YTD performance, and +$234M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCOW and XMMO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MCOW vs XMMO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCOW XMMO | -6.59%-2.31% | -8.20%+2.98% | -6.79%+3.27% | n/a+29.87% | n/a+99.93% | n/a+74.49% |
| Flows | MCOW XMMO | -+$106M | -+$322M | -+$234M | -+$1.09B | -+$3.23B | -+$3.43B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCOW XMMO | +16.62%+16.94% | n/a+21.21% | n/a+19.41% | n/a+21.00% |
| Max drawdown | MCOW XMMO | -11.28%-6.02% | n/a-13.91% | n/a-24.88% | n/a-27.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCOW XMMO | 50d11d | n/a37d | n/a289d | n/a812d |
MCOW | XMMO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $142.85 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $143.15 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MCOW | XMMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MCOW | XMMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $142.85 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.21% |
| AuM | $0.91 M | $5.49 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.35% |
MCOW | XMMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | S&P Midcap 400 Momentum Index |
| N° of holdings | 78 | 76 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | March 3, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MCOW and XMMO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD), while XMMO has returned 3.27%. That puts XMMO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCOW or XMMO?
Year-to-date, the MCOW ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$234M for XMMO.
Which ETF is bigger: MCOW or XMMO?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW holds $0.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while XMMO manages $5.49 B.
What sectors do the MCOW and XMMO ETFs invest in?
MCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, XMMO focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the MCOW ETF and XMMO ETF?
MCOW top holdings include PURE STORAGE, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and RAMBUS. XMMO holds in its top three: CIENA, CURTISS WRIGHT and TWILIO.
Which ETF is more diversified: MCOW or XMMO?
MCOW holds 78 securities with 41.93% of its assets in the top 15. XMMO has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.5%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
