Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MCOWvsXMHQETF Comparison
Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. MCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, XMHQ's top sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Financials. MCOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.31% for XMHQ. MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. XMHQ performs better with -0.38% YTD performance, and -$43M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCOW and XMHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MCOW vs XMHQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCOW XMHQ | -6.59%-4.84% | -8.20%-1.20% | -6.79%-0.38% | n/a+15.18% | n/a+55.87% | n/a+43.91% |
| Flows | MCOW XMHQ | --$60M | --$64M | --$43M | --$949M | -+$3.94B | -+$4.22B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCOW XMHQ | +16.62%+14.56% | n/a+20.42% | n/a+18.65% | n/a+20.76% |
| Max drawdown | MCOW XMHQ | -11.28%-6.79% | n/a-13.30% | n/a-24.40% | n/a-25.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCOW XMHQ | 50d50d | n/a43d | n/a415d | n/a597d |
MCOW | XMHQ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $102.06 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $101.96 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MCOW | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MCOW | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $102.06 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.10% |
| AuM | $0.91 M | $5.00 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.31% |
MCOW | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | S&P MidCap 400 Quality Index |
| N° of holdings | 78 | 79 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | December 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MCOW and XMHQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD), while XMHQ has lost -0.38%. That puts XMHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCOW or XMHQ?
Year-to-date, the MCOW ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$43M for XMHQ.
Which ETF is bigger: MCOW or XMHQ?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW holds $0.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while XMHQ manages $5.00 B.
What sectors do the MCOW and XMHQ ETFs invest in?
MCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, XMHQ focuses on Health Care, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the MCOW ETF and XMHQ ETF?
MCOW top holdings include PURE STORAGE, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and RAMBUS. XMHQ holds in its top three: ILLUMINA, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and TECHNIPFMC PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: MCOW or XMHQ?
MCOW holds 78 securities with 41.93% of its assets in the top 15. XMHQ has 80 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.02%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
