Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MCOWvsXJHETF Comparison
Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. MCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, XJH's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. MCOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.12% for XJH. MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. XJH performs better with 0.85% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCOW and XJH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MCOW vs XJH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCOW XJH | -6.59%-6.78% | -8.20%-0.23% | -6.79%+0.85% | n/a+18.85% | n/a+43.40% | n/a+29.91% |
| Flows | MCOW XJH | -+$5M | -+$7M | -+$5M | -+$49M | -+$182M | -+$275M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCOW XJH | +16.62%+15.90% | n/a+21.02% | n/a+18.23% | n/a+19.81% |
| Max drawdown | MCOW XJH | -11.28%-7.78% | n/a-15.00% | n/a-24.38% | n/a-24.99% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCOW XJH | 50d19d | n/a46d | n/a379d | n/a815d |
MCOW | XJH | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.05 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $45.02 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MCOW | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MCOW | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $45.05 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.07% |
| AuM | $0.91 M | $341.82 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.12% |
MCOW | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index |
| N° of holdings | 78 | 346 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | September 22, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MCOW and XJH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD), while XJH has returned 0.85%. That puts XJH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCOW or XJH?
Year-to-date, the MCOW ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$5M for XJH.
Which ETF is bigger: MCOW or XJH?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW holds $0.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while XJH manages $341.82 M.
What sectors do the MCOW and XJH ETFs invest in?
MCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, XJH focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the MCOW ETF and XJH ETF?
MCOW top holdings include PURE STORAGE, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and RAMBUS. XJH holds in its top three: CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: MCOW or XJH?
MCOW holds 78 securities with 41.93% of its assets in the top 15. XJH has 356 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.01%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
