BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

MCOWvsSMAPETF Comparison

ETF 1

MCOW

Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

+0.99%

Full MCOW fund page

VS

ETF 2

SMAP

Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

+0.99%

Full SMAP fund page

Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. MCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, SMAP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. MCOW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.6% for SMAP. MCOW is up 0.39% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4K in YTD flows. SMAP performs better with 6.48% YTD performance, and -$26K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCOW and SMAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

MCOW vs SMAP performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 04/30/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	MCOW SMAP	+11.41%+10.66%	-0.24%+3.80%	+0.39%+6.48%	n/a+16.74%	n/an/a	n/an/a
Flows	MCOW SMAP	-$4K-	-$4K-$26K	-$4K-$26K	--$26K	--	--

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	MCOW SMAP	+19.61%+18.62%	n/a+16.30%	n/an/a	n/an/a
Max drawdown	MCOW SMAP	-11.35%-9.95%	n/a-9.95%	n/an/a	n/an/a
Max drawdown duration	MCOW SMAP	78d68d	n/a68d	n/an/a	n/an/a

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	MCOW	SMAP
Last sale 4/30/2026 at 1:30 PM		$26.28
Previous close 04/29/2026		$25.61
Consolidated volume 04/29/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of April 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

SMAP

is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	MCOW	SMAP
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 4/30/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	MCOW	SMAP
Last price	–	$26.28
1D performance	–	+2.63%
AuM	$0.98 M	$1.31 M
E/R	0.49%	0.6%

Characteristics

	MCOW	SMAP
Management strategy	Passive	Active
Provider	PACER ETFs	Amplify ETFs
Benchmark	S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index	-
N° of holdings	78	54
Asset class	-	-
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	August 27, 2025	October 23, 2024
ESG	No	No

More MCOW data on Trackinsight

More SMAP data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

MCOW

USA

91.04%

Other

8.96%

SMAP

USA

94.92%

Other

5.08%

Sectors

MCOW

Information Techn.

32.24%

Industrials

22.5%

Health Care

15.18%

Consumer Discreti.

11.12%

Other

18.96%

SMAP

Industrials

18.99%

Financials

14.65%

Health Care

14.16%

Information Techn.

12.84%

Consumer Discreti.

8.3%

Materials

7.57%

Other

23.49%

Diversification

MCOW

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

41.15%

SMAP

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

41.84%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of March 31, 2026

MCOW

PURE STORAGE

3.72%

MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC

3.64%

DOCUSIGN INC

3.58%

LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR

3.53%

RAMBUS

3.01%

MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES

2.95%

DT MIDSTREAM INC

2.68%

GRACO

2.65%

MUELLER INDUSTRIES

2.44%

CURTISS WRIGHT

2.29%

EXELIXIS

2.27%

JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS

2.26%

NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES

2.10%

ANTERO MIDSTREAM CORPORATION

2.07%

LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS

1.96%

SMAP

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS

3.71%

CASEYS GENERAL STORES

3.32%

WEST PHARM SVCS

3.10%

STIFEL FINANCIAL

3.05%

MATADOR RESOURCES

3.01%

MKS INSTRUMENTS

2.87%

CURTISS WRIGHT

2.77%

WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION

2.74%

WATSCO

2.64%

AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP

2.63%

RANGE RESOURCES

2.54%

MARKET CORPORATION

2.54%

EAGLE MATERIALS

2.38%

BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC

2.28%

APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES

2.26%

Frequently asked questions about MCOW and SMAP

How have the MCOW and SMAP ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 30, 2026, MCOW is up 0.39% year-to-date (YTD), while SMAP has returned 6.48%. That puts SMAP better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCOW or SMAP?

Year-to-date, the MCOW ETF saw -$4K in flows, compared to -$26K for SMAP.

Which ETF is bigger: MCOW or SMAP?

As of April 30, 2026, MCOW holds $0.98 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMAP manages $1.31 M.

What sectors do the MCOW and SMAP ETFs invest in?

MCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, SMAP focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.

What are the top holdings of the MCOW ETF and SMAP ETF?

MCOW top holdings include PURE STORAGE, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and DOCUSIGN INC. SMAP holds in its top three: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, CASEYS GENERAL STORES and WEST PHARM SVCS.

MCOWvsSMAPETF Comparison

Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF

Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF

MCOW vs SMAP performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the MCOW and SMAP ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 30, 2026, MCOW is up 0.39% year-to-date (YTD), while SMAP has returned 6.48%. That puts SMAP better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCOW or SMAP?

Year-to-date, the MCOW ETF saw -$4K in flows, compared to -$26K for SMAP.

Which ETF is bigger: MCOW or SMAP?

As of April 30, 2026, MCOW holds $0.98 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMAP manages $1.31 M.

What sectors do the MCOW and SMAP ETFs invest in?

MCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, SMAP focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.

What are the top holdings of the MCOW ETF and SMAP ETF?

MCOW top holdings include PURE STORAGE, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and DOCUSIGN INC. SMAP holds in its top three: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, CASEYS GENERAL STORES and WEST PHARM SVCS.

Which ETF is more diversified: MCOW or SMAP?

MCOW holds 78 securities with 41.15% of its assets in the top 15. SMAP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.84%.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up