Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MCOWvsSMAPETF Comparison
Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF (SMAP) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. MCOW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.6% for SMAP. MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. SMAP performs better with -2.6% YTD performance, and -$26K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCOW and SMAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MCOW vs SMAP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCOW SMAP | -6.59%-7.76% | -8.20%-3.92% | -6.79%-2.60% | n/a+7.37% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MCOW SMAP | -+$620K | --$26K | --$26K | --$26K | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCOW SMAP | +16.62%+15.01% | n/a+20.80% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MCOW SMAP | -11.28%-8.85% | n/a-14.26% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MCOW SMAP | 50d33d | n/a46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
MCOW | SMAP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.12 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $24.18 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MCOW | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MCOW | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $24.12 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.27% |
| AuM | $0.91 M | $1.20 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.6% |
MCOW | SMAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 78 | 56 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | October 23, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MCOW and SMAP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD), while SMAP has lost -2.6%. That puts SMAP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCOW or SMAP?
Year-to-date, the MCOW ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$26K for SMAP.
Which ETF is bigger: MCOW or SMAP?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW holds $0.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMAP manages $1.20 M.
What sectors do the MCOW and SMAP ETFs invest in?
MCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, SMAP focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the MCOW ETF and SMAP ETF?
MCOW top holdings include PURE STORAGE, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and RAMBUS. SMAP holds in its top three: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, CURTISS WRIGHT and STIFEL FINANCIAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: MCOW or SMAP?
MCOW holds 78 securities with 41.93% of its assets in the top 15. SMAP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.75%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.