Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MCOWvsQMIDETF Comparison
Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. MCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, QMID's top sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology. MCOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.38% for QMID. MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. QMID performs better with -3.25% YTD performance, and +$706K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCOW and QMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MCOW vs QMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCOW QMID | -6.59%-5.28% | -8.20%-5.14% | -6.79%-3.25% | n/a+12.38% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MCOW QMID | -+$706K | -+$706K | -+$706K | -+$710K | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCOW QMID | +16.62%+14.43% | n/a+20.54% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MCOW QMID | -11.28%-7.29% | n/a-13.86% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MCOW QMID | 50d50d | n/a46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
MCOW | QMID | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.33 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $27.33 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MCOW | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MCOW | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $27.33 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.02% |
| AuM | $0.91 M | $2.05 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.38% |
MCOW | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index |
| N° of holdings | 78 | 120 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | January 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MCOW and QMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD), while QMID has lost -3.25%. That puts QMID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCOW or QMID?
Year-to-date, the MCOW ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$706K for QMID.
Which ETF is bigger: MCOW or QMID?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW holds $0.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMID manages $2.05 M.
What sectors do the MCOW and QMID ETFs invest in?
MCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, QMID focuses on Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the MCOW ETF and QMID ETF?
MCOW top holdings include PURE STORAGE, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and RAMBUS. QMID holds in its top three: US65290E1010, ATI INC and COEUR MINING INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: MCOW or QMID?
MCOW holds 78 securities with 41.93% of its assets in the top 15. QMID has 125 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.78%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.