Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MCOWvsIJKETF Comparison
Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. MCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, IJK's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. MCOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.17% for IJK. MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. IJK performs better with 3.1% YTD performance, and -$63M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCOW and IJK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MCOW vs IJK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCOW IJK | -6.59%-4.28% | -8.20%+2.38% | -6.79%+3.10% | n/a+23.38% | n/a+50.21% | n/a+30.00% |
| Flows | MCOW IJK | -+$71M | --$75M | --$63M | --$700M | --$779M | --$883M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCOW IJK | +16.62%+18.16% | n/a+22.05% | n/a+18.50% | n/a+20.52% |
| Max drawdown | MCOW IJK | -11.28%-7.51% | n/a-15.02% | n/a-25.48% | n/a-29.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCOW IJK | 50d11d | n/a46d | n/a379d | n/a834d |
MCOW | IJK | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $99.95 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $100.14 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MCOW | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MCOW | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $99.95 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.19% |
| AuM | $0.91 M | $9.35 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.17% |
MCOW | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 78 | 228 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | July 24, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MCOW and IJK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW is down -6.79% year-to-date (YTD), while IJK has returned 3.1%. That puts IJK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCOW or IJK?
Year-to-date, the MCOW ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$63M for IJK.
Which ETF is bigger: MCOW or IJK?
As of March 13, 2026, MCOW holds $0.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while IJK manages $9.35 B.
What sectors do the MCOW and IJK ETFs invest in?
MCOW leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, IJK focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the MCOW ETF and IJK ETF?
MCOW top holdings include PURE STORAGE, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and RAMBUS. IJK holds in its top three: CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: MCOW or IJK?
MCOW holds 78 securities with 41.93% of its assets in the top 15. IJK has 238 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.49%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
