MCOWvsGRPMETF Comparison
VS
Pacer S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (MCOW) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. MCOW's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, GRPM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. MCOW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.35% for GRPM. MCOW is up 8.84% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4K in YTD flows. GRPM performs better with 18.68% YTD performance, and -$75M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCOW and GRPM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCOW vs GRPM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCOW GRPM | -5.51%-1.34% | +1.07%+9.30% | +8.84%+18.68% | +4.44%+18.42% | n/a+61.03% | n/a+64.74% |
| Flows | MCOW GRPM | --$33K | --$14M | -$4K-$75M | -$4K-$24M | -+$118M | -+$234M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCOW GRPM | +15.59%+14.17% | +17.35%+15.51% | n/a+19.94% | n/a+20.78% |
| Max drawdown | MCOW GRPM | -6.58%-3.95% | -14.99%-7.71% | n/a-27.87% | n/a-27.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCOW GRPM | 32d18d | 246d66d | n/a421d | n/a421d |
Trading data
MCOW | GRPM | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $141.17 | |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $141.49 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCOW | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCOW | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $141.17 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.23% |
| AuM | $1.07 M | $502.13 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
MCOW | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index | S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index |
| N° of holdings | 77 | 60 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 27, 2025 | December 3, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCOW
USA
93.56%
Other
6.44%
GRPM
USA
93.81%
Other
6.19%
Sectors
MCOW
Technology
35.24%
Industrials
17.43%
Healthcare
14.85%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.06%
Other
23.42%
GRPM
Finance
26.16%
Healthcare
19.12%
Technology
17.52%
Other
37.2%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.14%
GRPM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.2%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MCOW
Everpure, Inc.
4.91%
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
3.65%
Lattice Semiconductor Corp.
3.62%
DocuSign, Inc.
3.60%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
3.58%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.03%
Exelixis, Inc.
2.67%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.57%
Jazz Pharmaceuticals Plc
2.52%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
2.32%
Rambus, Inc.
2.29%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.18%
DT Midstream, Inc.
2.15%
Qualys, Inc.
2.03%
Okta, Inc.
2.02%
GRPM
Duolingo, Inc.
2.80%
Kinsale Capital Group, Inc.
2.52%
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
2.47%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
2.43%
Paylocity Holding Corp.
2.30%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
2.28%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
2.28%
AppFolio, Inc.
2.25%
InterDigital, Inc.
2.22%
TechnipFMC plc
2.18%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
2.16%
Hecla Mining Co.
2.12%
SharkNinja, Inc.
2.09%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.06%
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
2.05%
Frequently asked questions about MCOW and GRPM
How have the MCOW and GRPM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, MCOW is up 8.84% year-to-date (YTD), while GRPM has returned 18.68%. That puts GRPM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCOW or GRPM?
Year-to-date, the MCOW ETF saw -$4K in flows, compared to -$75M for GRPM.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCOW or GRPM?
Over the past year, MCOW had a volatility of 17.35%, while GRPM experienced 15.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCOW or GRPM?
As of September 14, 2026, MCOW holds $1.07 M in assets under management (AUM), while GRPM manages $502.13 M.
What sectors do the MCOW and GRPM ETFs invest in?
MCOW leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, GRPM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the MCOW ETF and GRPM ETF?
MCOW top holdings include Everpure, Inc., Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corp.. GRPM holds in its top three: Duolingo, Inc., Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. and RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCOW or GRPM?
MCOW holds 77 securities with 43.14% of its assets in the top 15. GRPM has 60 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.2%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
