MCHSvsKBAETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF
This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
-0.93%
Matthews China Innovators Active ETF (MCHS) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. MCHS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, KBA's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. MCHS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.79% for KBA. MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. KBA performs worse with -3.4% YTD performance, and -$112M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCHS and KBA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCHS vs KBA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCHS KBA | -7.62%-6.58% | -15.21%-12.22% | +12.94%-3.40% | +12.22%+2.44% | n/a+43.98% | n/a-7.68% |
| Flows | MCHS KBA | -$3M-$19M | -$3M-$24M | +$15M-$112M | +$15M-$151M | --$308M | --$252M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCHS KBA | +26.07%+18.09% | +29.55%+19.16% | n/a+19.20% | n/a+19.97% |
| Max drawdown | MCHS KBA | -16.66%-12.91% | -29.74%-15.67% | n/a-19.76% | n/a-45.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCHS KBA | 60d86d | 108d115d | n/a316d | n/a1604d |
Trading data
MCHS | KBA | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.43 | $29.67 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $36.70 | $29.50 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCHS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCHS | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCHS | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.43 | $29.67 |
| 1D performance | -0.74% | +0.58% |
| AuM | $14.69 M | $111.84 M |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
MCHS | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matthews Asia | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI China A 50 Connect Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2024 | March 4, 2014 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCHS
China
63.71%
Hong Kong
15.04%
Taiwan
10.72%
Other
10.53%
KBA
China
99.57%
Other
0.43%
Sectors
MCHS
Technology
35.23%
Industrials
28.55%
Healthcare
7.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.42%
Other
21.35%
KBA
Technology
30.82%
Finance
18.32%
Industrials
16.8%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.66%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.97%
Other
14.43%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCHS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.46%
KBA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MCHS
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
5.57%
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
5.39%
NetEase, Inc.
4.48%
Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology Co., Ltd.
4.17%
Neway Valve (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
4.01%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.97%
Luckin Coffee, Inc.
3.79%
Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
3.52%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.
3.21%
Acter Technology Integration Group Co., Ltd.
2.93%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
2.87%
Wasion Holdings Ltd.
2.74%
Wuxi NCE Power Co., Ltd.
2.63%
Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.61%
Minth Group Ltd.
2.60%
KBA
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
8.64%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
7.23%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
4.94%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
4.76%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
3.63%
Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd.
3.57%
CMOC Group Ltd.
3.47%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
3.07%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.91%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.91%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
2.64%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.61%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
2.55%
Wanhua Chemical Group Co., Ltd.
2.49%
Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
2.20%
Frequently asked questions about MCHS and KBA
How have the MCHS and KBA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD), while KBA has lost -3.4%. That puts MCHS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCHS or KBA?
Year-to-date, the MCHS ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to -$112M for KBA.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCHS or KBA?
Over the past year, MCHS had a volatility of 29.55%, while KBA experienced 19.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCHS or KBA?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS holds $14.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while KBA manages $111.84 M.
What sectors do the MCHS and KBA ETFs invest in?
MCHS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, KBA focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MCHS ETF and KBA ETF?
MCHS top holdings include Midea Group Co. Ltd., SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. and NetEase, Inc.. KBA holds in its top three: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. and Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCHS or KBA?
MCHS holds 44 securities with 54.46% of its assets in the top 15. KBA has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.62%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MCHS & KBA
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KBA
Advertisement
Advertisement
