MCHSvsGXCETF Comparison
VS
Matthews China Innovators Active ETF (MCHS) and State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. MCHS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, GXC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. MCHS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.59% for GXC. MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. GXC performs worse with -12.79% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCHS and GXC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCHS vs GXC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCHS GXC | -7.62%-3.81% | -15.21%-6.16% | +12.94%-12.79% | +12.22%-15.45% | n/a+29.72% | n/a-16.13% |
| Flows | MCHS GXC | -$3M-$4M | -$3M+$18M | +$15M+$19M | +$15M+$43M | --$407M | --$642M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCHS GXC | +26.07%+15.93% | +29.55%+18.17% | n/a+22.25% | n/a+24.65% |
| Max drawdown | MCHS GXC | -16.66%-9.76% | -29.74%-19.14% | n/a-23.08% | n/a-47.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCHS GXC | 60d67d | 108d260d | n/a284d | n/a1437d |
Trading data
MCHS | GXC | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.43 | $84.04 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $36.70 | $84.78 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCHS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCHS | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCHS | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.43 | $84.04 |
| 1D performance | -0.74% | -0.87% |
| AuM | $14.69 M | $443.16 M |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
MCHS | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matthews Asia | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | S&P China BMI Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 1175 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2024 | March 20, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCHS
China
63.71%
Hong Kong
15.04%
Taiwan
10.72%
Other
10.53%
GXC
China
87.99%
Other
12.01%
Sectors
MCHS
Technology
35.23%
Industrials
28.55%
Healthcare
7.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.42%
Other
21.35%
GXC
Technology
24.28%
Finance
20.38%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
13.99%
Industrials
9.22%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.68%
Other
24.45%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCHS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.46%
GXC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MCHS
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
5.57%
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
5.39%
NetEase, Inc.
4.48%
Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology Co., Ltd.
4.17%
Neway Valve (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
4.01%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.97%
Luckin Coffee, Inc.
3.79%
Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
3.52%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.
3.21%
Acter Technology Integration Group Co., Ltd.
2.93%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
2.87%
Wasion Holdings Ltd.
2.74%
Wuxi NCE Power Co., Ltd.
2.63%
Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.61%
Minth Group Ltd.
2.60%
GXC
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.88%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.86%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.42%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.14%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
1.85%
Xiaomi Corp.
1.73%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.71%
Meituan
1.60%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.33%
NetEase, Inc.
1.21%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.16%
JD.com, Inc.
1.14%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
0.85%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.84%
Baidu, Inc.
0.80%
Frequently asked questions about MCHS and GXC
How have the MCHS and GXC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD), while GXC has lost -12.79%. That puts MCHS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCHS or GXC?
Year-to-date, the MCHS ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to +$19M for GXC.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCHS or GXC?
Over the past year, MCHS had a volatility of 29.55%, while GXC experienced 18.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCHS or GXC?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS holds $14.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while GXC manages $443.16 M.
What sectors do the MCHS and GXC ETFs invest in?
MCHS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, GXC focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the MCHS ETF and GXC ETF?
MCHS top holdings include Midea Group Co. Ltd., SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. and NetEase, Inc.. GXC holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCHS or GXC?
MCHS holds 44 securities with 54.46% of its assets in the top 15. GXC has 1238 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.51%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MCHS & GXC
Advertisement
