MCHSvsFXIETF Comparison
VS
Matthews China Innovators Active ETF (MCHS) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. MCHS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, FXI's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. MCHS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.73% for FXI. MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. FXI performs worse with -11.42% YTD performance, and -$1.79B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCHS and FXI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCHS vs FXI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCHS FXI | -7.62%-0.63% | -15.21%-2.36% | +12.94%-11.42% | +12.22%-14.00% | n/a+36.74% | n/a-7.21% |
| Flows | MCHS FXI | -$3M-$148M | -$3M-$476M | +$15M-$1.79B | +$15M-$1.94B | --$1.79B | -+$372M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCHS FXI | +26.07%+16.74% | +29.55%+18.73% | n/a+25.21% | n/a+29.21% |
| Max drawdown | MCHS FXI | -16.66%-8.98% | -29.74%-22.12% | n/a-23.30% | n/a-49.98% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCHS FXI | 60d78d | 108d260d | n/a379d | n/a1365d |
Trading data
MCHS | FXI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.43 | $33.84 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $36.70 | $34.26 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCHS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCHS | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCHS | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.43 | $33.84 |
| 1D performance | -0.74% | -1.23% |
| AuM | $14.69 M | $3.89 B |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.73% |
Characteristics
MCHS | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matthews Asia | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE China 50 Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 51 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2024 | October 5, 2004 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCHS
China
63.71%
Hong Kong
15.04%
Taiwan
10.72%
Other
10.53%
FXI
China
94.83%
Other
5.17%
Sectors
MCHS
Technology
35.23%
Industrials
28.55%
Healthcare
7.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.42%
Other
21.35%
FXI
Finance
37.64%
Technology
20.23%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.97%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.85%
Other
22.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCHS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.46%
FXI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.36%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MCHS
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
5.57%
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
5.39%
NetEase, Inc.
4.48%
Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology Co., Ltd.
4.17%
Neway Valve (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
4.01%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.97%
Luckin Coffee, Inc.
3.79%
Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
3.52%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.
3.21%
Acter Technology Integration Group Co., Ltd.
2.93%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
2.87%
Wasion Holdings Ltd.
2.74%
Wuxi NCE Power Co., Ltd.
2.63%
Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.61%
Minth Group Ltd.
2.60%
FXI
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
9.52%
China Construction Bank Corp.
9.37%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
8.65%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
6.37%
Xiaomi Corp.
5.01%
Meituan
4.49%
Bank of China Ltd.
4.15%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
3.81%
NetEase, Inc.
3.64%
BYD Co., Ltd.
3.35%
JD.com, Inc.
2.88%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
2.36%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
2.28%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
2.26%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.
2.21%
Frequently asked questions about MCHS and FXI
How have the MCHS and FXI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD), while FXI has lost -11.42%. That puts MCHS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCHS or FXI?
Year-to-date, the MCHS ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to -$1.79B for FXI.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCHS or FXI?
Over the past year, MCHS had a volatility of 29.55%, while FXI experienced 18.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCHS or FXI?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS holds $14.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while FXI manages $3.89 B.
What sectors do the MCHS and FXI ETFs invest in?
MCHS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FXI focuses on Finance, Technology and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the MCHS ETF and FXI ETF?
MCHS top holdings include Midea Group Co. Ltd., SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. and NetEase, Inc.. FXI holds in its top three: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp. and Tencent Holdings Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCHS or FXI?
MCHS holds 44 securities with 54.46% of its assets in the top 15. FXI has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.36%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MCHS & FXI
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
FXI
Growth Potential of China ETFs
January 30, 2023
FXI
Advertisement
Advertisement
