MCHSvsFLCHETF Comparison
VS
Matthews China Innovators Active ETF (MCHS) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. MCHS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, FLCH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. MCHS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.19% for FLCH. MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. FLCH performs worse with -14.03% YTD performance, and +$50M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCHS and FLCH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCHS vs FLCH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCHS FLCH | -7.62%-2.94% | -15.21%-5.98% | +12.94%-14.03% | +12.22%-17.16% | n/a+31.15% | n/a-16.51% |
| Flows | MCHS FLCH | -$3M-$25M | -$3M+$19M | +$15M+$50M | +$15M+$98M | -+$166M | -+$192M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCHS FLCH | +26.07%+16.60% | +29.55%+19.00% | n/a+23.06% | n/a+26.31% |
| Max drawdown | MCHS FLCH | -16.66%-9.46% | -29.74%-21.10% | n/a-22.50% | n/a-49.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCHS FLCH | 60d67d | 108d260d | n/a379d | n/a1422d |
Trading data
MCHS | FLCH | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.43 | $20.21 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $36.70 | $20.42 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCHS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCHS | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCHS | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.43 | $20.21 |
| 1D performance | -0.74% | -1.03% |
| AuM | $14.69 M | $280.91 M |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.19% |
Characteristics
MCHS | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matthews Asia | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE China RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 893 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2024 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCHS
China
63.71%
Hong Kong
15.04%
Taiwan
10.72%
Other
10.53%
FLCH
China
91.11%
Other
8.89%
Sectors
MCHS
Technology
35.23%
Industrials
28.55%
Healthcare
7.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.42%
Other
21.35%
FLCH
Technology
24.35%
Finance
21.84%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
16.22%
Industrials
7.57%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.14%
Other
22.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCHS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.46%
FLCH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.7%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MCHS
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
5.57%
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
5.39%
NetEase, Inc.
4.48%
Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology Co., Ltd.
4.17%
Neway Valve (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
4.01%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.97%
Luckin Coffee, Inc.
3.79%
Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
3.52%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.
3.21%
Acter Technology Integration Group Co., Ltd.
2.93%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
2.87%
Wasion Holdings Ltd.
2.74%
Wuxi NCE Power Co., Ltd.
2.63%
Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.61%
Minth Group Ltd.
2.60%
FLCH
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
12.44%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
9.88%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.64%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.69%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.34%
Xiaomi Corp.
2.20%
Meituan
1.92%
Bank of China Ltd.
1.68%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.67%
NetEase, Inc.
1.59%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.54%
JD.com, Inc.
1.25%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
0.97%
China Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
0.97%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
0.92%
Frequently asked questions about MCHS and FLCH
How have the MCHS and FLCH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD), while FLCH has lost -14.03%. That puts MCHS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCHS or FLCH?
Year-to-date, the MCHS ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to +$50M for FLCH.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCHS or FLCH?
Over the past year, MCHS had a volatility of 29.55%, while FLCH experienced 19%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCHS or FLCH?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS holds $14.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLCH manages $280.91 M.
What sectors do the MCHS and FLCH ETFs invest in?
MCHS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FLCH focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the MCHS ETF and FLCH ETF?
MCHS top holdings include Midea Group Co. Ltd., SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. and NetEase, Inc.. FLCH holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCHS or FLCH?
MCHS holds 44 securities with 54.46% of its assets in the top 15. FLCH has 998 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.7%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
