MCHSvsEWHETF Comparison
VS
Matthews China Innovators Active ETF (MCHS) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. MCHS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, EWH's top sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. MCHS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.5% for EWH. MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. EWH performs worse with 5.14% YTD performance, and +$570M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCHS and EWH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCHS vs EWH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCHS EWH | -7.62%-1.51% | -15.21%-0.13% | +12.94%+5.14% | +12.22%+10.18% | n/a+45.87% | n/a+9.84% |
| Flows | MCHS EWH | -$3M+$99M | -$3M+$25M | +$15M+$570M | +$15M+$507M | -+$506M | -+$423M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCHS EWH | +26.07%+13.83% | +29.55%+15.05% | n/a+19.09% | n/a+18.94% |
| Max drawdown | MCHS EWH | -16.66%-7.64% | -29.74%-13.26% | n/a-22.70% | n/a-36.19% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCHS EWH | 60d54d | 108d156d | n/a246d | n/a1307d |
Trading data
MCHS | EWH | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.55 | $21.96 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $36.43 | $22.09 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCHS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCHS | EWH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCHS | EWH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.55 | $21.96 |
| 1D performance | +0.35% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $14.69 M | $1.22 B |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
MCHS | EWH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matthews Asia | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI Hong Kong 25/50 Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 26 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2024 | March 12, 1996 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCHS
China
63.71%
Hong Kong
15.04%
Taiwan
10.72%
Other
10.53%
EWH
Hong Kong
95.35%
Other
4.65%
Sectors
MCHS
Technology
35.23%
Industrials
28.55%
Healthcare
7.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.42%
Other
21.35%
EWH
Finance
62.53%
Utilities
11.27%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.32%
Industrials
8.63%
Other
8.25%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCHS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.46%
EWH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
83.58%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MCHS
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
5.57%
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
5.39%
NetEase, Inc.
4.48%
Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology Co., Ltd.
4.17%
Neway Valve (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
4.01%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.97%
Luckin Coffee, Inc.
3.79%
Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
3.52%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.
3.21%
Acter Technology Integration Group Co., Ltd.
2.93%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
2.87%
Wasion Holdings Ltd.
2.74%
Wuxi NCE Power Co., Ltd.
2.63%
Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.61%
Minth Group Ltd.
2.60%
EWH
AIA Group Ltd.
23.11%
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
15.86%
CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd.
5.72%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
4.64%
CLP Holdings Ltd.
4.37%
Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd.
4.33%
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
4.28%
Link Real Estate Investment Trust
3.49%
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
2.93%
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.
2.86%
CK Asset Holdings Ltd.
2.81%
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.
2.44%
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.39%
Jardine Matheson Holdings Ltd.
2.27%
WH Group Ltd. (HK)
2.08%
Frequently asked questions about MCHS and EWH
How have the MCHS and EWH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD), while EWH has returned 5.14%. That puts MCHS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCHS or EWH?
Year-to-date, the MCHS ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to +$570M for EWH.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCHS or EWH?
Over the past year, MCHS had a volatility of 29.55%, while EWH experienced 15.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCHS or EWH?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS holds $14.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while EWH manages $1.22 B.
What sectors do the MCHS and EWH ETFs invest in?
MCHS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, EWH focuses on Finance, Utilities and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the MCHS ETF and EWH ETF?
MCHS top holdings include Midea Group Co. Ltd., SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. and NetEase, Inc.. EWH holds in its top three: AIA Group Ltd., Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. and CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCHS or EWH?
MCHS holds 44 securities with 54.46% of its assets in the top 15. EWH has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 83.58%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
