MCHSvsCXSEETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
-0.93%
Matthews China Innovators Active ETF (MCHS) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. MCHS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, CXSE's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. MCHS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.32% for CXSE. MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. CXSE performs worse with -15.67% YTD performance, and -$12M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCHS and CXSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCHS vs CXSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCHS CXSE | -7.62%-6.08% | -15.21%-13.05% | +12.94%-15.67% | +12.22%-18.57% | n/a+20.99% | n/a-34.53% |
| Flows | MCHS CXSE | -$3M-$29M | -$3M-$29M | +$15M-$12M | +$15M-$12M | --$209M | --$59M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCHS CXSE | +26.07%+20.33% | +29.55%+21.04% | n/a+24.38% | n/a+27.96% |
| Max drawdown | MCHS CXSE | -16.66%-14.09% | -29.74%-21.77% | n/a-24.32% | n/a-57.72% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCHS CXSE | 60d67d | 108d354d | n/a379d | n/a1817d |
Trading data
MCHS | CXSE | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.43 | $33.27 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $36.70 | $33.66 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCHS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCHS | CXSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCHS | CXSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.43 | $33.27 |
| 1D performance | -0.74% | -1.16% |
| AuM | $14.69 M | $405.13 M |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
MCHS | CXSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matthews Asia | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | - | WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 248 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2024 | September 19, 2012 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Exposure
Countries
MCHS
China
63.71%
Hong Kong
15.04%
Taiwan
10.72%
Other
10.53%
CXSE
China
90.61%
Other
9.39%
Sectors
MCHS
Technology
35.23%
Industrials
28.55%
Healthcare
7.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.42%
Other
21.35%
CXSE
Technology
35.03%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
16.23%
Industrials
12.36%
Healthcare
10.6%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.11%
Other
16.65%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCHS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.46%
CXSE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.31%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MCHS
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
5.57%
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
5.39%
NetEase, Inc.
4.48%
Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology Co., Ltd.
4.17%
Neway Valve (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
4.01%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.97%
Luckin Coffee, Inc.
3.79%
Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
3.52%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.
3.21%
Acter Technology Integration Group Co., Ltd.
2.93%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
2.87%
Wasion Holdings Ltd.
2.74%
Wuxi NCE Power Co., Ltd.
2.63%
Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.61%
Minth Group Ltd.
2.60%
CXSE
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
7.61%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.55%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
4.62%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
3.62%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
2.54%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.24%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.14%
Xiaomi Corp.
2.03%
Meituan
1.77%
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
1.77%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.65%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
1.52%
NetEase, Inc.
1.46%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.45%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
1.36%
Frequently asked questions about MCHS and CXSE
How have the MCHS and CXSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD), while CXSE has lost -15.67%. That puts MCHS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCHS or CXSE?
Year-to-date, the MCHS ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to -$12M for CXSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCHS or CXSE?
Over the past year, MCHS had a volatility of 29.55%, while CXSE experienced 21.04%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCHS or CXSE?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS holds $14.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while CXSE manages $405.13 M.
What sectors do the MCHS and CXSE ETFs invest in?
MCHS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, CXSE focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MCHS ETF and CXSE ETF?
MCHS top holdings include Midea Group Co. Ltd., SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. and NetEase, Inc.. CXSE holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCHS or CXSE?
MCHS holds 44 securities with 54.46% of its assets in the top 15. CXSE has 260 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.31%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
