MCHSvsASHRETF Comparison
VS
Matthews China Innovators Active ETF (MCHS) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. MCHS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, ASHR's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. MCHS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.65% for ASHR. MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. ASHR performs worse with -4.84% YTD performance, and -$416M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCHS and ASHR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCHS vs ASHR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCHS ASHR | -7.62%-6.54% | -15.21%-9.66% | +12.94%-4.84% | +12.22%-2.19% | n/a+31.60% | n/a-11.69% |
| Flows | MCHS ASHR | -$3M-$57M | -$3M+$114M | +$15M-$416M | +$15M-$435M | --$744M | --$159M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCHS ASHR | +26.07%+17.61% | +29.55%+17.76% | n/a+21.85% | n/a+20.75% |
| Max drawdown | MCHS ASHR | -16.66%-11.24% | -29.74%-15.95% | n/a-30.96% | n/a-43.53% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCHS ASHR | 60d60d | 108d116d | n/a505d | n/a1768d |
Trading data
MCHS | ASHR | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.43 | $31.12 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $36.70 | $31.49 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCHS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCHS | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCHS | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.43 | $31.12 |
| 1D performance | -0.74% | -1.17% |
| AuM | $14.69 M | $1.34 B |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
MCHS | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matthews Asia | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | - | CSI 300 Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 284 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2024 | November 5, 2013 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCHS
China
63.71%
Hong Kong
15.04%
Taiwan
10.72%
Other
10.53%
ASHR
China
100%
Other
0%
Sectors
MCHS
Technology
35.23%
Industrials
28.55%
Healthcare
7.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.42%
Other
21.35%
ASHR
Technology
29.13%
Finance
20.09%
Industrials
17.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.67%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.81%
Other
13.35%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCHS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.46%
ASHR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.35%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MCHS
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
5.57%
SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd.
5.39%
NetEase, Inc.
4.48%
Beijing Huafeng Test & Control Technology Co., Ltd.
4.17%
Neway Valve (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
4.01%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.97%
Luckin Coffee, Inc.
3.79%
Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
3.52%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd.
3.21%
Acter Technology Integration Group Co., Ltd.
2.93%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
2.87%
Wasion Holdings Ltd.
2.74%
Wuxi NCE Power Co., Ltd.
2.63%
Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.61%
Minth Group Ltd.
2.60%
ASHR
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.75%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
3.68%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
3.12%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
2.29%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
2.21%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.15%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
1.89%
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
1.64%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
1.50%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
1.33%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
1.28%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.19%
Industrial Bank Co., Ltd.
1.14%
Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
1.12%
CITIC Securities Co., Ltd.
1.08%
Frequently asked questions about MCHS and ASHR
How have the MCHS and ASHR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS is up 12.94% year-to-date (YTD), while ASHR has lost -4.84%. That puts MCHS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCHS or ASHR?
Year-to-date, the MCHS ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to -$416M for ASHR.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCHS or ASHR?
Over the past year, MCHS had a volatility of 29.55%, while ASHR experienced 17.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCHS or ASHR?
As of October 16, 2026, MCHS holds $14.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while ASHR manages $1.34 B.
What sectors do the MCHS and ASHR ETFs invest in?
MCHS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ASHR focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MCHS ETF and ASHR ETF?
MCHS top holdings include Midea Group Co. Ltd., SITC International Holdings Co., Ltd. and NetEase, Inc.. ASHR holds in its top three: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd. and Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCHS or ASHR?
MCHS holds 44 securities with 54.46% of its assets in the top 15. ASHR has 284 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.35%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MCHS & ASHR
Advertisement
