MCDSvsVOETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. MCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.03% for VO. MCDS is up 8.9% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. VO performs worse with 5.93% YTD performance, and +$2.83B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCDS and VO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCDS vs VO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCDS VO | +9.08%+8.24% | +5.30%+2.38% | +8.90%+5.93% | +24.86%+22.10% | n/a+54.76% | n/a+41.39% |
| Flows | MCDS VO | -+$457M | -+$2.57B | -+$2.83B | +$7K+$9.40B | -+$20.24B | -+$29.50B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCDS VO | +15.54%+14.99% | +13.66%+12.65% | n/a+14.79% | n/a+17.59% |
| Max drawdown | MCDS VO | -7.49%-8.12% | -7.49%-8.12% | n/a-18.93% | n/a-27.54% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCDS VO | 46d49d | 46d49d | n/a211d | n/a972d |
Trading data
MCDS | VO | |
Last sale 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.70 | $76.58 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $63.74 | $76.73 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCDS | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCDS | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $63.70 | $76.58 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $7.64 M | $98.64 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
MCDS | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | - | CRSP U.S. Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 173 | 269 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | January 26, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCDS
USA
94.4%
Other
5.6%
VO
USA
92.71%
Other
7.29%
Sectors
MCDS
Industrials
17.46%
Information Techn.
14.2%
Financials
13.29%
Consumer Discreti.
10.66%
Health Care
8.61%
Energy
7.82%
Other
27.95%
VO
Industrials
16.8%
Information Techn.
14.58%
Financials
12.17%
Consumer Discreti.
10.4%
Utilities
8.82%
Energy
8.76%
Other
28.46%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.03%
VO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
12.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
MCDS
WESTERN DIGITAL
1.76%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC
1.64%
TERADYNE
1.47%
MARATHON PETROLEUM
1.31%
HILTON INC
1.25%
ROSS STORES
1.24%
XCEL ENERGY
1.24%
QUANTA SERVICES
1.21%
CARDINAL HEALTH
1.21%
DOVER
1.16%
CMS ENERGY
1.15%
WABTEC
1.15%
STATE STREET
1.09%
ENTERGY
1.08%
CHENIERE ENERGY
1.07%
VO
VERTIV HOLDINGS
1.02%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC
1.00%
WESTERN DIGITAL
1.00%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP
0.93%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC
0.93%
QUANTA SERVICES
0.89%
SCHLUMBERGER
0.84%
CUMMINS
0.81%
VALERO ENERGY
0.80%
PHILLIPS 66
0.79%
MARATHON PETROLEUM
0.78%
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS
0.78%
CRH PLC
0.76%
ROSS STORES
0.76%
GENERAL MOTORS
0.73%
Frequently asked questions about MCDS and VO
How have the MCDS and VO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, MCDS is up 8.9% year-to-date (YTD), while VO has returned 5.93%. That puts MCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCDS or VO?
Year-to-date, the MCDS ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$2.83B for VO.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCDS or VO?
Over the past year, MCDS had a volatility of 13.66%, while VO experienced 12.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCDS or VO?
As of April 27, 2026, MCDS holds $7.64 M in assets under management (AUM), while VO manages $98.64 B.
What sectors do the MCDS and VO ETFs invest in?
MCDS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, VO focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the MCDS ETF and VO ETF?
MCDS top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and TERADYNE. VO holds in its top three: VERTIV HOLDINGS, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and WESTERN DIGITAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: MCDS or VO?
MCDS holds 179 securities with 19.03% of its assets in the top 15. VO has 289 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
