MCDSvsVOETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. MCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.03% for VO. MCDS is up 17.13% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4K in YTD flows. VO performs worse with 13.54% YTD performance, and +$5.17B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCDS and VO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCDS vs VO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCDS VO | +0.87%+1.09% | +7.55%+6.48% | +17.13%+13.54% | +21.53%+15.94% | n/a+53.26% | n/a+45.98% |
| Flows | MCDS VO | -+$74M | -$4K+$2.17B | -$4K+$5.17B | +$14K+$8.41B | -+$21.93B | -+$30.89B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCDS VO | +12.14%+11.44% | +13.22%+12.51% | n/a+14.73% | n/a+17.56% |
| Max drawdown | MCDS VO | -3.13%-3.19% | -7.49%-8.12% | n/a-18.93% | n/a-27.54% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCDS VO | 16d8d | 46d49d | n/a211d | n/a972d |
Trading data
MCDS | VO | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $69.14 | $82.86 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $68.32 | $81.78 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCDS | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCDS | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $69.14 | $82.86 |
| 1D performance | +1.20% | +1.32% |
| AuM | $8.20 M | $107.77 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
MCDS | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | - | CRSP U.S. Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 185 | 278 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | January 26, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCDS
USA
97.18%
Other
2.82%
VO
USA
95.94%
Other
4.06%
Sectors
MCDS
Finance
20.78%
Industrials
18.07%
Technology
17.55%
Healthcare
8.96%
Other
34.64%
VO
Finance
19.55%
Industrials
18.03%
Technology
17.76%
Utilities
8.34%
Healthcare
7.78%
Energy
7.17%
Other
21.38%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.19%
VO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.22%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
MCDS
Western Digital Corp.
2.94%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
1.62%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.60%
Quanta Services, Inc.
1.35%
State Street Corp.
1.29%
Sandisk Corp.
1.26%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
1.24%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.18%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
1.15%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.13%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.13%
Dover Corp.
1.12%
Ross Stores, Inc.
1.08%
M&T Bank Corp.
1.06%
Corning, Inc.
1.04%
VO
Vertiv Holdings Co.
1.22%
Western Digital Corp.
1.06%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.04%
Quanta Services, Inc.
1.04%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
1.04%
Cummins, Inc.
0.95%
Datadog, Inc.
0.83%
Bloom Energy Corp.
0.79%
Constellation Energy Corp.
0.78%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
0.76%
Cloudflare, Inc.
0.76%
Valero Energy Corp.
0.75%
Coherent Corp.
0.74%
Royal Caribbean Group
0.74%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.73%
Frequently asked questions about MCDS and VO
How have the MCDS and VO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, MCDS is up 17.13% year-to-date (YTD), while VO has returned 13.54%. That puts MCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCDS or VO?
Year-to-date, the MCDS ETF saw -$4K in flows, compared to +$5.17B for VO.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCDS or VO?
Over the past year, MCDS had a volatility of 13.22%, while VO experienced 12.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCDS or VO?
As of August 3, 2026, MCDS holds $8.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while VO manages $107.77 B.
What sectors do the MCDS and VO ETFs invest in?
MCDS leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, VO focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the MCDS ETF and VO ETF?
MCDS top holdings include Western Digital Corp., Howmet Aerospace, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc.. VO holds in its top three: Vertiv Holdings Co., Western Digital Corp. and Seagate Technology Holdings Plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: MCDS or VO?
MCDS holds 185 securities with 20.19% of its assets in the top 15. VO has 282 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.22%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
