Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MCDSvsREMCETF Comparison
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. MCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.32% for REMC. MCDS is up 2.73% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. REMC performs worse with 1.23% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCDS and REMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MCDS vs REMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCDS REMC | -3.48%-2.80% | +1.93%-0.06% | +2.73%+1.23% | +16.09%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MCDS REMC | --$2M | -+$3M | --$2M | +$32K- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCDS REMC | +13.23%+12.42% | +19.07%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MCDS REMC | -4.24%-3.42% | -14.55%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MCDS REMC | 12d11d | 46dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
MCDS | REMC | |
Last sale 3/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $60.12 | $20.13 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $60.60 | $20.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
MCDS | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $60.12 | $20.13 |
| 1D performance | -0.80% | -0.09% |
| AuM | $7.22 M | $3.05 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.32% |
MCDS | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 174 | 266 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | December 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MCDS and REMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, MCDS is up 2.73% year-to-date (YTD), while REMC has returned 1.23%. That puts MCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCDS or REMC?
Year-to-date, the MCDS ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$2M for REMC.
Which ETF is bigger: MCDS or REMC?
As of March 10, 2026, MCDS holds $7.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while REMC manages $3.05 M.
What sectors do the MCDS and REMC ETFs invest in?
MCDS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, REMC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the MCDS ETF and REMC ETF?
MCDS top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC and CARDINAL HEALTH. REMC holds in its top three: HILTON INC, PHILLIPS 66 and VALERO ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: MCDS or REMC?
MCDS holds 180 securities with 17.28% of its assets in the top 15. REMC has 271 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.89%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
