MCDSvsJHMMETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. MCDS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.42% for JHMM. MCDS is up 12.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. JHMM performs worse with 11.28% YTD performance, and +$844M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCDS and JHMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCDS vs JHMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCDS JHMM | -5.02%-4.51% | -1.44%-1.22% | +12.87%+11.28% | +14.18%+12.77% | n/a+53.97% | n/a+47.42% |
| Flows | MCDS JHMM | +$1M+$73M | +$1M+$352M | +$1M+$844M | +$1M+$779M | -+$1.12B | -+$2.09B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCDS JHMM | +10.40%+10.98% | +13.17%+14.09% | n/a+16.29% | n/a+18.24% |
| Max drawdown | MCDS JHMM | -6.90%-6.31% | -7.49%-8.57% | n/a-21.83% | n/a-24.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCDS JHMM | 33d33d | 46d49d | n/a269d | n/a835d |
Trading data
MCDS | JHMM | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.79 | $72.57 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $66.01 | $72.93 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCDS | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCDS | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.79 | $72.57 |
| 1D performance | -0.32% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $9.22 M | $5.93 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.42% |
Characteristics
MCDS | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | - | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 202 | 651 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCDS
USA
96.81%
Other
3.19%
JHMM
USA
95.28%
Other
4.72%
Sectors
MCDS
Finance
21.87%
Industrials
16.39%
Technology
16.05%
Healthcare
10.7%
Other
34.99%
JHMM
Finance
22.9%
Industrials
16.41%
Technology
14.74%
Healthcare
11.04%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.84%
Other
27.07%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
15.97%
JHMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.55%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MCDS
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.39%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
1.23%
State Street Corp.
1.21%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.17%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.15%
M&T Bank Corp.
1.11%
Dover Corp.
0.99%
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
0.99%
Loews Corp.
0.98%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.98%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
0.97%
Performance Food Group Co.
0.96%
CMS Energy Corp.
0.96%
Entergy Corp.
0.96%
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
0.94%
JHMM
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.66%
Flex Ltd.
0.62%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.56%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.53%
Targa Resources Corp.
0.52%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.51%
State Street Corp.
0.48%
eBay, Inc.
0.48%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.47%
Fifth Third Bancorp
0.47%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
0.46%
Entergy Corp.
0.45%
Coherent Corp.
0.45%
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
0.45%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.45%
Frequently asked questions about MCDS and JHMM
How have the MCDS and JHMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, MCDS is up 12.87% year-to-date (YTD), while JHMM has returned 11.28%. That puts MCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCDS or JHMM?
Year-to-date, the MCDS ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to +$844M for JHMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCDS or JHMM?
Over the past year, MCDS had a volatility of 13.17%, while JHMM experienced 14.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCDS or JHMM?
As of September 18, 2026, MCDS holds $9.22 M in assets under management (AUM), while JHMM manages $5.93 B.
What sectors do the MCDS and JHMM ETFs invest in?
MCDS leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, JHMM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the MCDS ETF and JHMM ETF?
MCDS top holdings include Marathon Petroleum Corp., Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. and State Street Corp.. JHMM holds in its top three: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., Flex Ltd. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCDS or JHMM?
MCDS holds 202 securities with 15.97% of its assets in the top 15. JHMM has 658 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.55%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
