MCDSvsJHMMETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. MCDS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.42% for JHMM. MCDS is up 17.13% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4K in YTD flows. JHMM performs worse with 14.84% YTD performance, and +$717M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCDS and JHMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCDS vs JHMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCDS JHMM | +0.87%+0.40% | +7.55%+5.35% | +17.13%+14.84% | +21.53%+21.47% | n/a+53.06% | n/a+49.78% |
| Flows | MCDS JHMM | -+$65M | -$4K+$345M | -$4K+$717M | +$14K+$898M | -+$1.03B | -+$2.01B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCDS JHMM | +12.14%+13.29% | +13.22%+14.22% | n/a+16.32% | n/a+18.24% |
| Max drawdown | MCDS JHMM | -3.13%-3.63% | -7.49%-8.57% | n/a-21.83% | n/a-24.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCDS JHMM | 16d16d | 46d49d | n/a269d | n/a835d |
Trading data
MCDS | JHMM | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $69.14 | $76.27 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $68.32 | $74.95 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCDS | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCDS | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $69.14 | $76.27 |
| 1D performance | +1.20% | +1.76% |
| AuM | $8.20 M | $5.99 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.42% |
Characteristics
MCDS | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | - | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 185 | 652 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCDS
USA
97.18%
Other
2.82%
JHMM
USA
95.05%
Other
4.95%
Sectors
MCDS
Finance
20.78%
Industrials
18.07%
Technology
17.55%
Healthcare
8.96%
Other
34.64%
JHMM
Finance
21.57%
Industrials
17.39%
Technology
16.19%
Healthcare
10.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.88%
Other
26.42%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.19%
JHMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
MCDS
Western Digital Corp.
2.94%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
1.62%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.60%
Quanta Services, Inc.
1.35%
State Street Corp.
1.29%
Sandisk Corp.
1.26%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
1.24%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.18%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
1.15%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.13%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.13%
Dover Corp.
1.12%
Ross Stores, Inc.
1.08%
M&T Bank Corp.
1.06%
Corning, Inc.
1.04%
JHMM
Flex Ltd.
0.86%
Coherent Corp.
0.68%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.65%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.63%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.63%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.60%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.54%
Targa Resources Corp.
0.53%
Ciena Corp.
0.52%
MKS, Inc.
0.51%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.47%
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
0.46%
Entergy Corp.
0.46%
Fifth Third Bancorp
0.46%
eBay, Inc.
0.45%
Frequently asked questions about MCDS and JHMM
How have the MCDS and JHMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, MCDS is up 17.13% year-to-date (YTD), while JHMM has returned 14.84%. That puts MCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCDS or JHMM?
Year-to-date, the MCDS ETF saw -$4K in flows, compared to +$717M for JHMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCDS or JHMM?
Over the past year, MCDS had a volatility of 13.22%, while JHMM experienced 14.22%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCDS or JHMM?
As of August 3, 2026, MCDS holds $8.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while JHMM manages $5.99 B.
What sectors do the MCDS and JHMM ETFs invest in?
MCDS leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, JHMM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the MCDS ETF and JHMM ETF?
MCDS top holdings include Western Digital Corp., Howmet Aerospace, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc.. JHMM holds in its top three: Flex Ltd., Coherent Corp. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCDS or JHMM?
MCDS holds 185 securities with 20.19% of its assets in the top 15. JHMM has 661 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
