MCDSvsFLQMETF Comparison
VS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. MCDS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, FLQM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. MCDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.3% for FLQM. MCDS is up 13.2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. FLQM performs worse with 6.47% YTD performance, and -$330M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MCDS and FLQM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MCDS vs FLQM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MCDS FLQM | -5.80%-2.56% | -0.35%+5.34% | +13.20%+6.47% | +15.46%+6.54% | n/a+41.56% | n/a+40.66% |
| Flows | MCDS FLQM | +$1M-$30M | +$1M-$97M | +$1M-$330M | +$1M-$311M | -+$960M | -+$1.19B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MCDS FLQM | +10.51%+12.64% | +13.18%+12.30% | n/a+14.53% | n/a+16.46% |
| Max drawdown | MCDS FLQM | -6.90%-4.67% | -7.49%-7.59% | n/a-19.74% | n/a-22.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | MCDS FLQM | 32d24d | 46d137d | n/a406d | n/a714d |
Trading data
MCDS | FLQM | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $66.01 | $59.00 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $65.59 | $59.42 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMCDS | FLQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MCDS | FLQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.01 | $59.00 |
| 1D performance | +0.65% | -0.71% |
| AuM | $9.24 M | $1.49 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
MCDS | FLQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | LibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 202 | 202 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 7, 2024 | April 26, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MCDS
USA
96.81%
Other
3.19%
FLQM
USA
95.1%
Other
4.9%
Sectors
MCDS
Finance
21.87%
Industrials
16.39%
Technology
16.05%
Healthcare
10.7%
Other
34.99%
FLQM
Finance
19.73%
Healthcare
15.26%
Industrials
14.53%
Technology
13.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.5%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.84%
Other
18.98%
Advertisement
Diversification
MCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
15.97%
FLQM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.37%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MCDS
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.39%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
1.23%
State Street Corp.
1.21%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.17%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.15%
M&T Bank Corp.
1.11%
Dover Corp.
0.99%
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
0.99%
Loews Corp.
0.98%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.98%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
0.97%
Performance Food Group Co.
0.96%
CMS Energy Corp.
0.96%
Entergy Corp.
0.96%
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
0.94%
FLQM
The Allstate Corp.
1.21%
Expedia Group, Inc.
1.17%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.15%
Paychex, Inc.
1.12%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
1.12%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.11%
Cencora, Inc.
1.10%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.10%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
1.08%
Kenvue, Inc.
1.07%
Sysco Corp.
1.06%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
1.05%
Fastenal Co.
1.02%
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
1.00%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
1.00%
Frequently asked questions about MCDS and FLQM
How have the MCDS and FLQM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, MCDS is up 13.2% year-to-date (YTD), while FLQM has returned 6.47%. That puts MCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MCDS or FLQM?
Year-to-date, the MCDS ETF saw +$1M in flows, compared to -$330M for FLQM.
Which ETF is more volatile: MCDS or FLQM?
Over the past year, MCDS had a volatility of 13.18%, while FLQM experienced 12.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: MCDS or FLQM?
As of September 17, 2026, MCDS holds $9.24 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLQM manages $1.49 B.
What sectors do the MCDS and FLQM ETFs invest in?
MCDS leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, FLQM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MCDS ETF and FLQM ETF?
MCDS top holdings include Marathon Petroleum Corp., Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. and State Street Corp.. FLQM holds in its top three: The Allstate Corp., Expedia Group, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: MCDS or FLQM?
MCDS holds 202 securities with 15.97% of its assets in the top 15. FLQM has 205 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.37%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
