Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MBCCvsDYLGETF Comparison
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF (MBCC) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF (DYLG) is part of the Options Strategies segment. MBCC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, DYLG's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. MBCC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.06%, versus 0.35% for DYLG. MBCC is down -2.17% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. DYLG performs better with -2.09% YTD performance, and +$270K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MBCC and DYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MBCC vs DYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MBCC DYLG | -1.74%-4.38% | -1.96%-2.44% | -2.17%-2.09% | +7.85%+11.87% | +53.62%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | MBCC DYLG | +$9M- | +$17M+$1M | +$13M+$270K | +$18M+$4M | +$84M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MBCC DYLG | +11.34%+10.67% | +17.51%+14.27% | +14.45%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | MBCC DYLG | -3.83%-5.46% | -13.87%-10.54% | -18.57%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | MBCC DYLG | 64d30d | 45d78d | 128dn/a | n/an/a |
MBCC | DYLG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:59 PM | $35.51 | $25.85 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.14 | $26.23 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MBCC | DYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MBCC | DYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.51 | $25.85 |
| 1D performance | -1.74% | -1.46% |
| AuM | $150.88 M | $5.68 M |
| E/R | 1.06% | 0.35% |
MBCC | DYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Monarch Fund | Global X |
| Benchmark | Solactive Kingsview Blue Chips Core Index | Cboe DJIA Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 23 | 30 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 24, 2021 | July 25, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MBCC and DYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MBCC is down -2.17% year-to-date (YTD), while DYLG has lost -2.09%. That puts DYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MBCC or DYLG?
Year-to-date, the MBCC ETF saw +$13M in flows, compared to +$270K for DYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: MBCC or DYLG?
Over the past year, MBCC had a volatility of 17.51%, while DYLG experienced 14.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: MBCC or DYLG?
As of March 11, 2026, MBCC holds $150.88 M in assets under management (AUM), while DYLG manages $5.68 M.
What sectors do the MBCC and DYLG ETFs invest in?
MBCC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, DYLG focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MBCC ETF and DYLG ETF?
MBCC top holdings include TEXAS INSTRUMENTS, PHILLIP MORRIS and META PLATFORMS. DYLG holds in its top three: THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, CATERPILLAR and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: MBCC or DYLG?
MBCC holds 23 securities with 65.1% of its assets in the top 15. DYLG has 30 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.03%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
