Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MAVFvsEQWLETF Comparison
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. MAVF's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Communication Services. In contrast, EQWL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. MAVF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.3% for EQWL. MAVF is down -0.02% year-to-date (YTD) with -$27K in YTD flows. EQWL performs better with 0.79% YTD performance, and +$313M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MAVF and EQWL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MAVF vs EQWL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MAVF EQWL | -4.63%-2.85% | -1.64%+0.39% | -0.02%+0.79% | +27.38%+18.39% | n/a+70.06% | n/a+76.70% |
| Flows | MAVF EQWL | -+$114M | -$28K+$366M | -$27K+$313M | -$599K+$1.01B | -+$1.77B | -+$1.86B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MAVF EQWL | +13.42%+9.23% | +19.30%+15.98% | n/a+13.03% | n/a+14.87% |
| Max drawdown | MAVF EQWL | -5.77%-2.99% | -14.00%-12.64% | n/a-15.14% | n/a-23.03% |
| Max drawdown duration | MAVF EQWL | 37d31d | 45d46d | n/a110d | n/a703d |
MAVF | EQWL | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $118.81 | $117.36 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $121.44 | $118.92 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MAVF | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MAVF | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $118.81 | $117.36 |
| 1D performance | -2.16% | -1.31% |
| AuM | $83.72 M | $2.32 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.3% |
MAVF | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Matrix Asset Advisors | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 100 Equal Weight Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 24, 2025 | December 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MAVF and EQWL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, MAVF is down -0.02% year-to-date (YTD), while EQWL has returned 0.79%. That puts EQWL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MAVF or EQWL?
Year-to-date, the MAVF ETF saw -$27K in flows, compared to +$313M for EQWL.
Which ETF is more volatile: MAVF or EQWL?
Over the past year, MAVF had a volatility of 19.3%, while EQWL experienced 15.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: MAVF or EQWL?
As of March 11, 2026, MAVF holds $83.72 M in assets under management (AUM), while EQWL manages $2.32 B.
What sectors do the MAVF and EQWL ETFs invest in?
MAVF leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Communication Services. Meanwhile, EQWL focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the MAVF ETF and EQWL ETF?
MAVF top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE. EQWL holds in its top three: BOEING U, LOCKHEED MARTIN and PHILLIP MORRIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: MAVF or EQWL?
MAVF holds 25 securities with 69.9% of its assets in the top 15. EQWL has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.86%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
