MAMBvsPTLCETF Comparison
VS
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. MAMB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.15%, versus 0.6% for PTLC. MAMB is down -0.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$50M in YTD flows. PTLC performs better with 7.24% YTD performance, and -$257M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MAMB and PTLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MAMB vs PTLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MAMB PTLC | -0.03%+1.45% | -1.29%+1.81% | -0.54%+7.24% | -0.69%+10.87% | +20.59%+50.64% | +1.30%+59.10% |
| Flows | MAMB PTLC | -$6K-$27M | +$9M-$50M | +$50M-$257M | +$56M-$374M | +$139M-$27M | +$166M+$167M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MAMB PTLC | +5.92%+11.16% | +5.78%+12.16% | +6.10%+12.29% | +7.09%+11.95% |
| Max drawdown | MAMB PTLC | -4.14%-3.07% | -5.82%-8.81% | -5.82%-15.08% | -19.16%-15.08% |
| Max drawdown duration | MAMB PTLC | 51d53d | 228d98d | 228d247d | 1432d247d |
Trading data
MAMB | PTLC | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.34 | $59.59 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $23.36 | $60.27 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MAMB | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MAMB | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.34 | $59.59 |
| 1D performance | -0.11% | -1.13% |
| AuM | $195.56 M | $3.30 B |
| E/R | 1.15% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
MAMB | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Monarch Fund | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Solactive Kingsview Ambassador Income Index | Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 24, 2021 | June 11, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MAMB
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Sectors
MAMB
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
MAMB
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
MAMB
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about MAMB and PTLC
How have the MAMB and PTLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, MAMB is down -0.54% year-to-date (YTD), while PTLC has returned 7.24%. That puts PTLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MAMB or PTLC?
Year-to-date, the MAMB ETF saw +$50M in flows, compared to -$257M for PTLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: MAMB or PTLC?
Over the past year, MAMB had a volatility of 5.78%, while PTLC experienced 12.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: MAMB or PTLC?
As of October 15, 2026, MAMB holds $195.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while PTLC manages $3.30 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
