Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LSVDvsRECSETF Comparison
LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. LSVD's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. In contrast, RECS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. LSVD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.15% for RECS. LSVD is up 0.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$407K in YTD flows. RECS performs worse with -1.74% YTD performance, and +$271M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LSVD and RECS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LSVD vs RECS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LSVD RECS | -2.98%-3.18% | +0.45%-2.21% | +0.77%-1.74% | +27.41%+21.89% | n/a+81.95% | n/a+97.25% |
| Flows | LSVD RECS | +$546K+$166M | +$452K+$486M | +$407K+$271M | +$508M+$2.27B | -+$4.22B | -+$4.19B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LSVD RECS | +12.68%+11.67% | +18.48%+18.00% | n/a+14.48% | n/a+16.56% |
| Max drawdown | LSVD RECS | -3.93%-3.59% | -14.20%-13.84% | n/a-18.49% | n/a-22.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | LSVD RECS | 29d29d | 45d45d | n/a126d | n/a573d |
LSVD | RECS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:48 PM | $30.00 | $39.67 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $30.00 | $40.10 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LSVD | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LSVD | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.00 | $39.67 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -1.07% |
| AuM | $552.46 M | $4.95 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.15% |
LSVD | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | LSV Asset Management | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | - | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 118 | 331 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 18, 2024 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LSVD and RECS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, LSVD is up 0.77% year-to-date (YTD), while RECS has lost -1.74%. That puts LSVD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LSVD or RECS?
Year-to-date, the LSVD ETF saw +$407K in flows, compared to +$271M for RECS.
Which ETF is more volatile: LSVD or RECS?
Over the past year, LSVD had a volatility of 18.48%, while RECS experienced 18%.
Which ETF is bigger: LSVD or RECS?
As of March 10, 2026, LSVD holds $552.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while RECS manages $4.95 B.
What sectors do the LSVD and RECS ETFs invest in?
LSVD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. Meanwhile, RECS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the LSVD ETF and RECS ETF?
LSVD top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. RECS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: LSVD or RECS?
LSVD holds 119 securities with 42.35% of its assets in the top 15. RECS has 336 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.28%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
