Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LSVDvsQLCETF Comparison
LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index ETF (QLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. LSVD's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. In contrast, QLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. LSVD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.26% for QLC. LSVD is up 0.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$347K in YTD flows. QLC performs worse with -1.54% YTD performance, and +$89M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LSVD and QLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LSVD vs QLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LSVD QLC | -2.72%-1.73% | +0.42%-1.28% | +0.94%-1.54% | +29.04%+26.37% | n/a+92.72% | n/a+96.09% |
| Flows | LSVD QLC | +$456K+$23M | +$392K+$95M | +$347K+$89M | +$508M+$339M | -+$496M | -+$529M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LSVD QLC | +12.68%+12.73% | +18.44%+18.31% | n/a+14.98% | n/a+16.91% |
| Max drawdown | LSVD QLC | -3.93%-4.48% | -14.20%-13.70% | n/a-18.73% | n/a-23.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | LSVD QLC | 30d31d | 45d45d | n/a124d | n/a702d |
LSVD | QLC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.42 | $79.18 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $29.60 | $79.76 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LSVD | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LSVD | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.42 | $79.18 |
| 1D performance | -0.61% | -0.73% |
| AuM | $553.32 M | $797.04 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.26% |
LSVD | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | LSV Asset Management | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | - | Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 118 | 163 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 18, 2024 | September 23, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LSVD and QLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, LSVD is up 0.94% year-to-date (YTD), while QLC has lost -1.54%. That puts LSVD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LSVD or QLC?
Year-to-date, the LSVD ETF saw +$347K in flows, compared to +$89M for QLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: LSVD or QLC?
Over the past year, LSVD had a volatility of 18.44%, while QLC experienced 18.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: LSVD or QLC?
As of March 11, 2026, LSVD holds $553.32 M in assets under management (AUM), while QLC manages $797.04 M.
What sectors do the LSVD and QLC ETFs invest in?
LSVD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. Meanwhile, QLC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the LSVD ETF and QLC ETF?
LSVD top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. QLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: LSVD or QLC?
LSVD holds 119 securities with 42.35% of its assets in the top 15. QLC has 166 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.62%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
