LSTvsFNDBETF Comparison
VS
Leuthold Select Industries ETF (LST) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) is part of the US All Cap segment. LST's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, FNDB's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. LST is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.25% for FNDB. LST is up 13.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$38M in YTD flows. FNDB performs better with 16.71% YTD performance, and +$181M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LST and FNDB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LST vs FNDB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LST FNDB | -0.81%+2.26% | +3.78%+7.25% | +13.90%+16.71% | +26.16%+28.97% | n/a+69.55% | n/a+93.27% |
| Flows | LST FNDB | -$64M+$43M | -$47M+$103M | +$38M+$181M | +$63M+$197M | -+$442M | -+$558M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LST FNDB | +14.78%+9.51% | +14.51%+10.84% | n/a+13.51% | n/a+15.49% |
| Max drawdown | LST FNDB | -4.33%-2.16% | -9.94%-6.34% | n/a-16.85% | n/a-19.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | LST FNDB | 43d7d | 49d63d | n/a213d | n/a546d |
Trading data
LST | FNDB | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.61 | $30.77 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $45.75 | $30.93 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LST
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLST | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LST | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.61 | $30.77 |
| 1D performance | -0.31% | -0.52% |
| AuM | $109.83 M | $1.40 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
LST | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | The Leuthold Group | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index |
| N° of holdings | 112 | 1388 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 17, 2025 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LST
USA
81.71%
Canada
7.65%
Other
10.64%
FNDB
USA
98.05%
Other
1.95%
Sectors
LST
Technology
30.76%
Healthcare
16.84%
Finance
12.79%
Energy
10.39%
Industrials
9.34%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.31%
Other
12.57%
FNDB
Technology
26.6%
Finance
15.89%
Healthcare
10.64%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.37%
Energy
9.71%
Industrials
7.64%
Other
19.14%
Diversification
LST
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.07%
FNDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.07%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
LST
Flex Ltd.
2.83%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.42%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.37%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.34%
Jabil, Inc.
2.07%
FedEx Corp.
1.88%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
1.84%
Microsoft Corp.
1.69%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.66%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.59%
McKesson Corp.
1.58%
Garrett Motion, Inc.
1.56%
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
1.47%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.39%
Kinross Gold Corp.
1.38%
FNDB
Apple, Inc.
4.55%
Intel Corp.
2.74%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.40%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
2.34%
Microsoft Corp.
2.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.91%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.81%
Chevron Corp.
1.48%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.41%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.40%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.39%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.34%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.17%
Walmart, Inc.
1.03%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.99%
Frequently asked questions about LST and FNDB
How have the LST and FNDB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, LST is up 13.9% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDB has returned 16.71%. That puts FNDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LST or FNDB?
Year-to-date, the LST ETF saw +$38M in flows, compared to +$181M for FNDB.
Which ETF is more volatile: LST or FNDB?
Over the past year, LST had a volatility of 14.51%, while FNDB experienced 10.84%.
Which ETF is bigger: LST or FNDB?
As of July 17, 2026, LST holds $109.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDB manages $1.40 B.
What sectors do the LST and FNDB ETFs invest in?
LST leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Finance. Meanwhile, FNDB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the LST ETF and FNDB ETF?
LST top holdings include Flex Ltd., Alphabet, Inc. and Cisco Systems, Inc.. FNDB holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Intel Corp. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LST or FNDB?
LST holds 112 securities with 28.07% of its assets in the top 15. FNDB has 1389 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.07%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LST & FNDB
Advertisement
