LSATvsSCHMETF Comparison
VS
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. LSAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.03% for SCHM. LSAT is up 25.12% year-to-date (YTD) with -$44M in YTD flows. SCHM performs worse with 17.28% YTD performance, and +$480M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LSAT and SCHM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LSAT vs SCHM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LSAT SCHM | +10.87%+2.68% | +5.58%+0.81% | +25.12%+17.28% | +23.76%+20.39% | +57.76%+72.46% | +51.34%+37.52% |
| Flows | LSAT SCHM | -$2M+$107M | +$3M+$216M | -$44M+$480M | -$21M+$575M | -$157M-$17M | -$88M+$1.13B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LSAT SCHM | +14.07%+13.50% | +13.47%+16.47% | +14.70%+17.94% | +16.39%+19.78% |
| Max drawdown | LSAT SCHM | -7.64%-7.18% | -7.64%-9.30% | -18.25%-23.35% | -20.69%-26.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | LSAT SCHM | 58d74d | 58d46d | 507d283d | 776d855d |
Trading data
LSAT | SCHM | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $49.53 | $35.13 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $48.70 | $34.92 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LSAT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLSAT | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
LSAT | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.53 | $35.13 |
| 1D performance | +1.70% | +0.60% |
| AuM | $71.77 M | $14.82 B |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
LSAT | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | LeaderShares ETFs | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Dow Jones U.S. Mid-Cap Total Stock Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 499 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 14, 2020 | January 13, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LSAT
USA
98.82%
Other
1.18%
SCHM
USA
96.76%
Other
3.24%
Sectors
LSAT
Finance
22.15%
Industrials
19.34%
Technology
15.33%
Consumer Cyclical.
9%
Healthcare
7.39%
Other
26.79%
SCHM
Finance
22.07%
Industrials
16.1%
Technology
15.95%
Healthcare
12.55%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.46%
Other
24.87%
Diversification
LSAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.45%
SCHM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.94%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
LSAT
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
4.74%
SM Energy Co.
4.23%
Morningstar, Inc.
4.05%
Fortinet, Inc.
3.96%
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
3.91%
Science Applications International Corp.
3.87%
GoDaddy, Inc.
3.75%
Match Group, Inc.
3.57%
H&R Block, Inc.
3.52%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
3.49%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
3.38%
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
3.36%
American International Group, Inc.
3.32%
APi Group Corp.
3.16%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
3.15%
SCHM
Okta, Inc.
0.72%
F5, Inc.
0.53%
Guardant Health, Inc.
0.49%
Entegris, Inc.
0.48%
Royal Gold, Inc.
0.45%
Incyte Corp.
0.44%
Packaging Corporation of America
0.44%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
0.43%
Omnicom Group, Inc.
0.43%
XPO, Inc.
0.43%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.42%
Viatris, Inc.
0.42%
United Therapeutics Corp.
0.42%
Roku, Inc.
0.42%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
0.41%
Frequently asked questions about LSAT and SCHM
How have the LSAT and SCHM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, LSAT is up 25.12% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHM has returned 17.28%. That puts LSAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LSAT or SCHM?
Year-to-date, the LSAT ETF saw -$44M in flows, compared to +$480M for SCHM.
Which ETF is more volatile: LSAT or SCHM?
Over the past year, LSAT had a volatility of 13.47%, while SCHM experienced 16.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: LSAT or SCHM?
As of October 30, 2026, LSAT holds $71.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHM manages $14.82 B.
What sectors do the LSAT and SCHM ETFs invest in?
LSAT leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, SCHM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LSAT ETF and SCHM ETF?
LSAT top holdings include Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc., SM Energy Co. and Morningstar, Inc.. SCHM holds in its top three: Okta, Inc., F5, Inc. and Guardant Health, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LSAT or SCHM?
LSAT holds 31 securities with 55.45% of its assets in the top 15. SCHM has 500 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.94%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
