LSATvsOUSMETF Comparison
VS
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. ALPS O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. LSAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.48% for OUSM. LSAT is up 18.23% year-to-date (YTD) with -$47M in YTD flows. OUSM performs worse with 10.44% YTD performance, and -$161M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LSAT and OUSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LSAT vs OUSM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LSAT OUSM | -1.54%-4.55% | +5.77%+1.70% | +18.23%+10.44% | +13.02%+8.06% | +39.84%+40.43% | +43.42%+46.88% |
| Flows | LSAT OUSM | --$12M | -$1M-$80M | -$47M-$161M | -$38M-$236M | -$171M+$299M | -$82M+$484M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LSAT OUSM | +14.04%+12.05% | +13.17%+12.67% | +14.69%+15.12% | +16.35%+16.46% |
| Max drawdown | LSAT OUSM | -3.77%-5.12% | -7.41%-9.24% | -18.25%-19.49% | -20.69%-19.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | LSAT OUSM | 23d30d | 204d124d | 507d435d | 776d435d |
Trading data
LSAT | OUSM | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.04 | |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $46.04 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LSAT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLSAT | OUSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LSAT | OUSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.04 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.01% | – |
| AuM | $64.37 M | $815.52 M |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.48% |
Characteristics
LSAT | OUSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | LeaderShares ETFs | O'Shares |
| Benchmark | - | O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 109 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 14, 2020 | December 30, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LSAT
USA
98.96%
Other
1.04%
OUSM
USA
97.86%
Other
2.14%
Sectors
LSAT
Finance
22.94%
Industrials
18.95%
Technology
14.03%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.97%
Other
35.11%
OUSM
Finance
22.18%
Industrials
18.11%
Technology
11.54%
Consumer Services
9.79%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.72%
Healthcare
8.47%
Other
21.18%
Advertisement
Diversification
LSAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53%
OUSM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.61%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LSAT
Morningstar, Inc.
4.03%
SM Energy Co.
3.97%
H&R Block, Inc.
3.71%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
3.69%
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
3.52%
DaVita, Inc.
3.52%
Fortinet, Inc.
3.45%
MGIC Investment Corp.
3.44%
Science Applications International Corp.
3.43%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
3.43%
American International Group, Inc.
3.39%
Match Group, Inc.
3.38%
Kemper Corp.
3.36%
Post Holdings, Inc.
3.35%
Sun Communities, Inc.
3.34%
OUSM
Chemed Corp.
2.42%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
2.34%
SEI Investments Co.
2.23%
National HealthCare Corp.
2.20%
Primerica, Inc.
2.19%
Radian Group Inc.
2.18%
MGIC Investment Corp.
2.17%
Essent Group Ltd.
2.15%
Donaldson Co., Inc.
2.11%
Royalty Pharma Plc
2.02%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.94%
The New York Times Co.
1.93%
Avnet, Inc.
1.92%
ITT, Inc.
1.91%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
1.90%
Frequently asked questions about LSAT and OUSM
How have the LSAT and OUSM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, LSAT is up 18.23% year-to-date (YTD), while OUSM has returned 10.44%. That puts LSAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LSAT or OUSM?
Year-to-date, the LSAT ETF saw -$47M in flows, compared to -$161M for OUSM.
Which ETF is more volatile: LSAT or OUSM?
Over the past year, LSAT had a volatility of 13.17%, while OUSM experienced 12.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: LSAT or OUSM?
As of September 16, 2026, LSAT holds $64.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while OUSM manages $815.52 M.
What sectors do the LSAT and OUSM ETFs invest in?
LSAT leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, OUSM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LSAT ETF and OUSM ETF?
LSAT top holdings include Morningstar, Inc., SM Energy Co. and H&R Block, Inc.. OUSM holds in its top three: Chemed Corp., Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and SEI Investments Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: LSAT or OUSM?
LSAT holds 31 securities with 53% of its assets in the top 15. OUSM has 109 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.61%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
