Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LSATvsLSAFETF Comparison
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. LeaderShares AlphaFactor Core ETF (LSAF) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. LSAT's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, LSAF's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Information Technology. LSAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.75% for LSAF. LSAT is up 0.67% year-to-date (YTD) with -$43M in YTD flows. LSAF performs better with 1.84% YTD performance, and -$50M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LSAT and LSAF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LSAT vs LSAF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LSAT LSAF | -2.30%-2.97% | -1.99%-0.04% | +0.67%+1.84% | +2.46%+19.46% | +34.43%+59.88% | +32.32%+56.52% |
| Flows | LSAT LSAF | --$1M | -$16M-$9M | -$43M-$50M | -$49M-$51M | -$157M-$112M | -$53M-$34M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LSAT LSAF | +13.55%+14.51% | +17.25%+19.43% | +15.18%+16.26% | +16.32%+18.53% |
| Max drawdown | LSAT LSAF | -3.72%-4.23% | -13.45%-13.06% | -18.25%-20.38% | -20.69%-24.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | LSAT LSAF | 29d31d | 91d45d | 471d268d | 776d745d |
LSAT | LSAF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.65 | $44.92 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $38.68 | $45.10 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LSAT | LSAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LSAT | LSAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.65 | $44.92 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | -0.40% |
| AuM | $58.73 M | $105.78 M |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.75% |
LSAT | LSAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | LeaderShares ETFs | LeaderShares ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 29 | 98 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 14, 2020 | September 27, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LSAT and LSAF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, LSAT is up 0.67% year-to-date (YTD), while LSAF has returned 1.84%. That puts LSAF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LSAT or LSAF?
Year-to-date, the LSAT ETF saw -$43M in flows, compared to -$50M for LSAF.
Which ETF is more volatile: LSAT or LSAF?
Over the past year, LSAT had a volatility of 17.25%, while LSAF experienced 19.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: LSAT or LSAF?
As of March 11, 2026, LSAT holds $58.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while LSAF manages $105.78 M.
What sectors do the LSAT and LSAF ETFs invest in?
LSAT leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, LSAF focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LSAT ETF and LSAF ETF?
LSAT top holdings include CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS and SOUTHWEST AIRLS. LSAF holds in its top three: US5128073062, AVNET and TERADYNE.
Which ETF is more diversified: LSAT or LSAF?
LSAT holds 29 securities with 52.99% of its assets in the top 15. LSAF has 98 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.99%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
