LSATvsJHMMETF Comparison
VS
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. LSAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.42% for JHMM. LSAT is up 18.23% year-to-date (YTD) with -$47M in YTD flows. JHMM performs worse with 11.04% YTD performance, and +$1.00B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LSAT and JHMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LSAT vs JHMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LSAT JHMM | -1.54%-5.99% | +5.77%-1.98% | +18.23%+11.04% | +13.02%+13.63% | +39.84%+53.64% | +43.42%+43.56% |
| Flows | LSAT JHMM | -+$241M | -$1M+$519M | -$47M+$1.00B | -$38M+$1.11B | -$171M+$1.28B | -$82M+$2.19B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LSAT JHMM | +14.04%+11.33% | +13.17%+14.10% | +14.69%+16.31% | +16.35%+18.26% |
| Max drawdown | LSAT JHMM | -3.77%-6.31% | -7.41%-8.57% | -18.25%-21.83% | -20.69%-24.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | LSAT JHMM | 23d31d | 204d49d | 507d269d | 776d835d |
Trading data
LSAT | JHMM | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.04 | $72.93 |
| Previous close 09/16/2026 | $46.04 | $72.50 |
| Consolidated volume 09/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LSAT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLSAT | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LSAT | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.04 | $72.93 |
| 1D performance | +0.01% | +0.59% |
| AuM | $64.37 M | $6.07 B |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.42% |
Characteristics
LSAT | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | LeaderShares ETFs | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | - | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 651 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 14, 2020 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
LSAT
USA
98.96%
Other
1.04%
JHMM
USA
95.28%
Other
4.72%
Sectors
LSAT
Finance
22.94%
Industrials
18.95%
Technology
14.03%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.97%
Other
35.11%
JHMM
Finance
22.9%
Industrials
16.41%
Technology
14.74%
Healthcare
11.04%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.84%
Other
27.07%
Diversification
LSAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53%
JHMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.55%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LSAT
Morningstar, Inc.
4.03%
SM Energy Co.
3.97%
H&R Block, Inc.
3.71%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
3.69%
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
3.52%
DaVita, Inc.
3.52%
Fortinet, Inc.
3.45%
MGIC Investment Corp.
3.44%
Science Applications International Corp.
3.43%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
3.43%
American International Group, Inc.
3.39%
Match Group, Inc.
3.38%
Kemper Corp.
3.36%
Post Holdings, Inc.
3.35%
Sun Communities, Inc.
3.34%
JHMM
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.66%
Flex Ltd.
0.62%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.56%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.53%
Targa Resources Corp.
0.52%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.51%
State Street Corp.
0.48%
eBay, Inc.
0.48%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.47%
Fifth Third Bancorp
0.47%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
0.46%
Entergy Corp.
0.45%
Coherent Corp.
0.45%
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
0.45%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.45%
Frequently asked questions about LSAT and JHMM
How have the LSAT and JHMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, LSAT is up 18.23% year-to-date (YTD), while JHMM has returned 11.04%. That puts LSAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LSAT or JHMM?
Year-to-date, the LSAT ETF saw -$47M in flows, compared to +$1.00B for JHMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: LSAT or JHMM?
Over the past year, LSAT had a volatility of 13.17%, while JHMM experienced 14.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: LSAT or JHMM?
As of September 16, 2026, LSAT holds $64.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while JHMM manages $6.07 B.
What sectors do the LSAT and JHMM ETFs invest in?
LSAT leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, JHMM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LSAT ETF and JHMM ETF?
LSAT top holdings include Morningstar, Inc., SM Energy Co. and H&R Block, Inc.. JHMM holds in its top three: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., Flex Ltd. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LSAT or JHMM?
LSAT holds 31 securities with 53% of its assets in the top 15. JHMM has 658 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.55%.
Advertisement
