LSATvsBKMCETF Comparison
VS
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. LSAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.04% for BKMC. LSAT is up 19.59% year-to-date (YTD) with -$47M in YTD flows. BKMC performs worse with 9.76% YTD performance, and -$17M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LSAT and BKMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LSAT vs BKMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LSAT BKMC | -0.41%-5.70% | +6.99%-2.77% | +19.59%+9.76% | +14.41%+10.42% | +41.54%+50.02% | +44.70%+39.89% |
| Flows | LSAT BKMC | -+$1M | -$1M-$3M | -$47M-$17M | -$38M-$10M | -$171M+$60M | -$82M+$415M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LSAT BKMC | +13.83%+11.78% | +13.12%+15.20% | +14.68%+17.64% | +16.34%+19.24% |
| Max drawdown | LSAT BKMC | -3.77%-6.06% | -7.41%-9.70% | -18.25%-23.71% | -20.69%-25.02% |
| Max drawdown duration | LSAT BKMC | 22d30d | 204d49d | 507d284d | 776d827d |
Trading data
LSAT | BKMC | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.04 | $39.32 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $46.42 | $39.50 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LSAT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLSAT | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LSAT | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.04 | $39.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.82% | -0.46% |
| AuM | $65.11 M | $638.61 M |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.04% |
Characteristics
LSAT | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | LeaderShares ETFs | BNY Mellon |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive GBS United States 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 391 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 14, 2020 | April 7, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LSAT
USA
98.96%
Other
1.04%
BKMC
USA
94.09%
Other
5.91%
Sectors
LSAT
Finance
22.94%
Industrials
18.95%
Technology
14.03%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.97%
Other
35.11%
BKMC
Finance
22.46%
Industrials
17.5%
Technology
14.29%
Healthcare
12.08%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.41%
Other
24.27%
Advertisement
Diversification
LSAT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53%
BKMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.89%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LSAT
Morningstar, Inc.
4.03%
SM Energy Co.
3.97%
H&R Block, Inc.
3.71%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
3.69%
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
3.52%
DaVita, Inc.
3.52%
Fortinet, Inc.
3.45%
MGIC Investment Corp.
3.44%
Science Applications International Corp.
3.43%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
3.43%
American International Group, Inc.
3.39%
Match Group, Inc.
3.38%
Kemper Corp.
3.36%
Post Holdings, Inc.
3.35%
Sun Communities, Inc.
3.34%
BKMC
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
0.87%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.71%
Twilio, Inc.
0.71%
ATI, Inc.
0.64%
nVent Electric Plc
0.61%
Okta, Inc.
0.60%
F5, Inc.
0.59%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.56%
Burlington Stores, Inc.
0.55%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
0.54%
Snap-On, Inc.
0.53%
Viatris, Inc.
0.51%
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
0.51%
MKS, Inc.
0.49%
Roku, Inc.
0.48%
Frequently asked questions about LSAT and BKMC
How have the LSAT and BKMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, LSAT is up 19.59% year-to-date (YTD), while BKMC has returned 9.76%. That puts LSAT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LSAT or BKMC?
Year-to-date, the LSAT ETF saw -$47M in flows, compared to -$17M for BKMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: LSAT or BKMC?
Over the past year, LSAT had a volatility of 13.12%, while BKMC experienced 15.2%.
Which ETF is bigger: LSAT or BKMC?
As of September 15, 2026, LSAT holds $65.11 M in assets under management (AUM), while BKMC manages $638.61 M.
What sectors do the LSAT and BKMC ETFs invest in?
LSAT leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, BKMC focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LSAT ETF and BKMC ETF?
LSAT top holdings include Morningstar, Inc., SM Energy Co. and H&R Block, Inc.. BKMC holds in its top three: Revolution Medicines, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp. and Twilio, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LSAT or BKMC?
LSAT holds 31 securities with 53% of its assets in the top 15. BKMC has 396 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.89%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
