Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LSATvsBBMCETF Comparison
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. LSAT's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, BBMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. LSAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.07% for BBMC. LSAT is up 0.67% year-to-date (YTD) with -$43M in YTD flows. BBMC performs better with 1.43% YTD performance, and +$31M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LSAT and BBMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LSAT vs BBMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LSAT BBMC | -2.30%-4.67% | -1.99%+0.14% | +0.67%+1.43% | +2.46%+21.62% | +34.43%+55.71% | +32.32%+31.33% |
| Flows | LSAT BBMC | --$6M | -$16M-$146M | -$43M+$31M | -$49M-$240M | -$157M-$294M | -$53M-$282M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LSAT BBMC | +13.55%+16.16% | +17.25%+21.58% | +15.18%+18.72% | +16.32%+20.67% |
| Max drawdown | LSAT BBMC | -3.72%-7.05% | -13.45%-15.74% | -18.25%-24.17% | -20.69%-30.03% |
| Max drawdown duration | LSAT BBMC | 29d14d | 91d46d | 471d275d | 776d1045d |
LSAT | BBMC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.65 | $107.89 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $38.68 | $108.09 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
LSAT | BBMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
LSAT | BBMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.65 | $107.89 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $58.73 M | $1.86 B |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.07% |
LSAT | BBMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | LeaderShares ETFs | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index |
| N° of holdings | 29 | 512 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 14, 2020 | April 14, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LSAT and BBMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, LSAT is up 0.67% year-to-date (YTD), while BBMC has returned 1.43%. That puts BBMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LSAT or BBMC?
Year-to-date, the LSAT ETF saw -$43M in flows, compared to +$31M for BBMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: LSAT or BBMC?
Over the past year, LSAT had a volatility of 17.25%, while BBMC experienced 21.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: LSAT or BBMC?
As of March 11, 2026, LSAT holds $58.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while BBMC manages $1.86 B.
What sectors do the LSAT and BBMC ETFs invest in?
LSAT leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, BBMC focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LSAT ETF and BBMC ETF?
LSAT top holdings include CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS and SOUTHWEST AIRLS. BBMC holds in its top three: US80004C2008, CIENA and US19247G1076.
Which ETF is more diversified: LSAT or BBMC?
LSAT holds 29 securities with 52.99% of its assets in the top 15. BBMC has 564 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.87%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.