Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LSATvsAFMCETF Comparison
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. LSAT's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, AFMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. LSAT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 0.65% for AFMC. LSAT is up 0.67% year-to-date (YTD) with -$43M in YTD flows. AFMC performs better with 2.67% YTD performance, and +$35M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LSAT and AFMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LSAT vs AFMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LSAT AFMC | -2.30%-4.45% | -1.99%+1.14% | +0.67%+2.67% | +2.46%+19.06% | +34.43%+62.84% | +32.32%+50.27% |
| Flows | LSAT AFMC | -+$18M | -$16M+$35M | -$43M+$35M | -$49M+$82M | -$157M+$120M | -$53M+$119M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LSAT AFMC | +13.55%+14.85% | +17.25%+19.50% | +15.18%+17.76% | +16.32%+19.49% |
| Max drawdown | LSAT AFMC | -3.72%-6.20% | -13.45%-13.21% | -18.25%-21.83% | -20.69%-25.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | LSAT AFMC | 29d18d | 91d46d | 471d289d | 776d752d |
LSAT | AFMC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.65 | $35.24 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $38.68 | $35.35 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
LSAT | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.65 | $35.24 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | -0.31% |
| AuM | $58.73 M | $132.52 M |
| E/R | 0.99% | 0.65% |
LSAT | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | LeaderShares ETFs | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 29 | 258 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 14, 2020 | December 3, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LSAT and AFMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, LSAT is up 0.67% year-to-date (YTD), while AFMC has returned 2.67%. That puts AFMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LSAT or AFMC?
Year-to-date, the LSAT ETF saw -$43M in flows, compared to +$35M for AFMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: LSAT or AFMC?
Over the past year, LSAT had a volatility of 17.25%, while AFMC experienced 19.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: LSAT or AFMC?
As of March 11, 2026, LSAT holds $58.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while AFMC manages $132.52 M.
What sectors do the LSAT and AFMC ETFs invest in?
LSAT leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, AFMC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the LSAT ETF and AFMC ETF?
LSAT top holdings include CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS and SOUTHWEST AIRLS. AFMC holds in its top three: MUELLER INDUSTRIES, FEDERATED HERMES and EXELIXIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: LSAT or AFMC?
LSAT holds 29 securities with 52.99% of its assets in the top 15. AFMC has 265 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.32%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
