Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
LRGGvsTHROETF Comparison
Macquarie Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO) is part of the Multiple Trends segment. LRGG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, THRO's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. LRGG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.57% for THRO. LRGG is down -8.92% year-to-date (YTD) with -$50M in YTD flows. THRO performs better with -2.02% YTD performance, and +$258M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LRGG and THRO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LRGG vs THRO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LRGG THRO | -0.85%-2.16% | -7.91%-3.00% | -8.92%-2.02% | +3.82%+20.22% | n/a+78.94% | n/an/a |
| Flows | LRGG THRO | -$33M+$214M | -$39M+$604M | -$50M+$258M | +$246M+$6.38B | -+$6.86B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LRGG THRO | +15.30%+13.54% | +18.18%+18.22% | n/a+15.79% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | LRGG THRO | -11.31%-5.02% | -13.48%-12.37% | n/a-19.10% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LRGG THRO | 72d43d | 133d45d | n/a154d | n/an/a |
LRGG | THRO | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.39 | $37.20 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $26.85 | $37.79 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
LRGG | THRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.39 | $37.20 |
| 1D performance | -1.71% | -1.56% |
| AuM | $298.40 M | $7.41 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.57% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the LRGG and THRO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, LRGG is down -8.92% year-to-date (YTD), while THRO has lost -2.02%. That puts THRO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LRGG or THRO?
Year-to-date, the LRGG ETF saw -$50M in flows, compared to +$258M for THRO.
Which ETF is more volatile: LRGG or THRO?
Over the past year, LRGG had a volatility of 18.18%, while THRO experienced 18.22%.
Which ETF is bigger: LRGG or THRO?
As of March 10, 2026, LRGG holds $298.40 M in assets under management (AUM), while THRO manages $7.41 B.
What sectors do the LRGG and THRO ETFs invest in?
LRGG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, THRO focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the LRGG ETF and THRO ETF?
LRGG top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE. THRO holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: LRGG or THRO?
LRGG holds 23 securities with 86.95% of its assets in the top 15. THRO has 206 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.25%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
