LQDWvsVCITETF Comparison
ETF 1
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.22%
VS
ETF 2
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
This fund is part of
US Corporate IG Bonds
-0.22%
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) is part of the US Corporate IG Bonds segment. LQDW's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, VCIT's top sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Technology. LQDW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.03% for VCIT. LQDW is up 1.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$59M in YTD flows. VCIT performs worse with -0.77% YTD performance, and +$12.72B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LQDW and VCIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LQDW vs VCIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LQDW VCIT | +0.24%-0.05% | -0.12%-0.69% | +1.05%-0.77% | +3.52%+1.44% | +12.43%+19.23% | n/a+3.39% |
| Flows | LQDW VCIT | +$15M+$2.88B | +$56M+$5.22B | +$59M+$12.72B | +$78M+$14.73B | +$252M+$29.10B | -+$31.46B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LQDW VCIT | +4.28%+4.08% | +3.92%+3.91% | +4.54%+5.12% | n/a+6.15% |
| Max drawdown | LQDW VCIT | -1.94%-1.76% | -2.59%-2.96% | -5.02%-5.03% | n/a-20.12% |
| Max drawdown duration | LQDW VCIT | 60d60d | 104d180d | 185d78d | n/a1382d |
Trading data
LQDW | VCIT | |
Last sale 8/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.43 | $81.15 |
| Previous close 08/27/2026 | $23.47 | $81.44 |
| Consolidated volume 08/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LQDW | VCIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LQDW | VCIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.43 | $81.15 |
| 1D performance | -0.17% | -0.36% |
| AuM | $321.15 M | $70.15 B |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LQDW
USA
87.06%
Other
12.94%
VCIT
USA
86.7%
Other
13.3%
Sectors
LQDW
Finance
33.3%
Technology
13.79%
Healthcare
9.96%
Energy
8.23%
Telecommunication.
8.08%
Other
26.63%
VCIT
Finance
40.29%
Utilities
10.28%
Technology
10.01%
Other
39.42%
Advertisement
Diversification
LQDW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
3.03%
VCIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
3.86%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LQDW
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
0.96%
Anheuser-Busch, 4.9% 1feb2046, USD
0.20%
CVS Health, 5.05% 25mar2048, USD
0.17%
T-Mobile USA, 3.875% 15apr2030, USD
0.16%
Goldman Sachs, 6.75% 1oct2037, USD
0.15%
Meta Platforms, 4.875% 15nov2035, USD
0.15%
Amazon.com, 4.875% 13mar2036, USD
0.15%
Meta Platforms, 6.3% 15may2056, USD
0.14%
Space Exploration Technologies, 5.875% 15jul2036, USD
0.14%
Pfizer, 4.75% 19may2033, USD
0.14%
Anheuser-Busch, 4.7% 1feb2036, USD
0.14%
Boeing, 5.805% 1may2050, USD
0.14%
Pfizer, 5.3% 19may2053, USD
0.14%
Meta Platforms, 5.625% 15nov2055, USD
0.13%
Space Exploration Technologies, 5.65% 15jul2033, USD
0.13%
VCIT
Amazon.com, 4.875% 13mar2036, USD
0.29%
Boeing, 6.528% 1may2034, USD
0.28%
Bank of America Corporation, 5.015% 22jul2033, USD (N)
0.27%
Space Exploration Technologies, 5.65% 15jul2033, USD
0.27%
Anheuser-Busch, 4.7% 1feb2036, USD
0.27%
Pfizer, 4.75% 19may2033, USD
0.26%
Meta Platforms, 5.25% 15may2036, USD
0.26%
Oracle, 5.7% 4feb2036, USD
0.26%
Meta Platforms, 4.875% 15nov2035, USD
0.26%
Amazon.com, 5.3% 9jul2036, USD
0.25%
JP Morgan, 5.35% 1jun2034, USD
0.25%
JP Morgan, 4.912% 25jul2033, USD
0.25%
Amgen, 5.25% 2mar2033, USD
0.24%
Goldman Sachs, 5.065% 21jan2037, USD
0.24%
Morgan Stanley, 5.296% 10apr2037, USD (I)
0.23%
Frequently asked questions about LQDW and VCIT
How have the LQDW and VCIT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 28, 2026, LQDW is up 1.05% year-to-date (YTD), while VCIT has lost -0.77%. That puts LQDW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LQDW or VCIT?
Year-to-date, the LQDW ETF saw +$59M in flows, compared to +$12.72B for VCIT.
Which ETF is more volatile: LQDW or VCIT?
Over the past year, LQDW had a volatility of 3.92%, while VCIT experienced 3.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: LQDW or VCIT?
As of August 28, 2026, LQDW holds $321.15 M in assets under management (AUM), while VCIT manages $70.15 B.
What sectors do the LQDW and VCIT ETFs invest in?
LQDW leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, VCIT focuses on Finance, Utilities and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LQDW ETF and VCIT ETF?
LQDW top holdings include BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, Anheuser-Busch, 4.9% 1feb2046, USD and CVS Health, 5.05% 25mar2048, USD. VCIT holds in its top three: Amazon.com, 4.875% 13mar2036, USD, Boeing, 6.528% 1may2034, USD and Bank of America Corporation, 5.015% 22jul2033, USD (N).
Which ETF is more diversified: LQDW or VCIT?
LQDW holds 3147 securities with 3.03% of its assets in the top 15. VCIT has 2261 securities and a top 15 weight of 3.86%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
