LQDWvsBUFRETF Comparison
ETF 1
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+0.22%
VS
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) and FT Vest Fund of Buffer ETF (BUFR) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. LQDW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.95% for BUFR. LQDW is up 0.49% year-to-date (YTD) with +$99M in YTD flows. BUFR performs better with 10.09% YTD performance, and +$1.57B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LQDW and BUFR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LQDW vs BUFR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LQDW BUFR | +0.89%+1.11% | -0.77%+2.71% | +0.49%+10.09% | +1.26%+13.31% | +14.00%+51.76% | n/a+62.01% |
| Flows | LQDW BUFR | +$38M+$160M | +$96M+$499M | +$99M+$1.57B | +$102M+$2.06B | +$258M+$6.24B | -+$7.87B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LQDW BUFR | +5.05%+5.54% | +4.24%+6.51% | +4.36%+8.96% | n/a+10.66% |
| Max drawdown | LQDW BUFR | -2.55%-1.48% | -3.48%-4.57% | -3.49%-12.72% | n/a-13.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | LQDW BUFR | 92d16d | 108d42d | 181d124d | n/a513d |
Trading data
LQDW | BUFR | |
Last sale 10/15/2026 at 7:20 PM | $22.70 | $37.67 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $22.53 | $37.80 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BUFR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLQDW | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/15/2026 at 7:20 PM
Live
Closed
LQDW | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.70 | $37.67 |
| 1D performance | +0.75% | -0.34% |
| AuM | $351.13 M | $10.86 B |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.95% |
Characteristics
LQDW | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Cboe LQD BuyWrite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 18, 2022 | August 10, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LQDW
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Sectors
LQDW
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
LQDW
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
LQDW
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about LQDW and BUFR
How have the LQDW and BUFR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, LQDW is up 0.49% year-to-date (YTD), while BUFR has returned 10.09%. That puts BUFR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LQDW or BUFR?
Year-to-date, the LQDW ETF saw +$99M in flows, compared to +$1.57B for BUFR.
Which ETF is more volatile: LQDW or BUFR?
Over the past year, LQDW had a volatility of 4.24%, while BUFR experienced 6.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: LQDW or BUFR?
As of October 15, 2026, LQDW holds $351.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while BUFR manages $10.86 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
