LQDIvsFTLSETF Comparison
VS
iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. LQDI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.33%, versus 1.38% for FTLS. LQDI is down -1.26% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. FTLS performs better with 9.5% YTD performance, and +$289M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LQDI and FTLS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LQDI vs FTLS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LQDI FTLS | -0.43%+1.75% | -2.12%+3.63% | -1.26%+9.50% | -2.37%+13.00% | +18.07%+49.71% | +1.42%+65.37% |
| Flows | LQDI FTLS | -$1M+$77M | -$1M+$107M | -$1M+$289M | -$28M+$398M | +$19M+$1.32B | +$27M+$1.61B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LQDI FTLS | +4.97%+5.74% | +4.61%+7.14% | +5.86%+8.66% | +8.03%+9.37% |
| Max drawdown | LQDI FTLS | -3.90%-1.19% | -5.22%-3.80% | -5.22%-11.43% | -20.56%-11.43% |
| Max drawdown duration | LQDI FTLS | 89d15d | 137d65d | 137d214d | 1394d214d |
Trading data
LQDI | FTLS | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.15 | $76.86 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $25.15 | $77.23 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTLS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLQDI | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LQDI | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.15 | $76.86 |
| 1D performance | +0.02% | -0.48% |
| AuM | $66.59 M | $2.65 B |
| E/R | 0.33% | 1.38% |
Characteristics
LQDI | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | BlackRock Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 8, 2018 | September 8, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LQDI
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Sectors
LQDI
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
LQDI
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
LQDI
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about LQDI and FTLS
How have the LQDI and FTLS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, LQDI is down -1.26% year-to-date (YTD), while FTLS has returned 9.5%. That puts FTLS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LQDI or FTLS?
Year-to-date, the LQDI ETF saw -$1M in flows, compared to +$289M for FTLS.
Which ETF is more volatile: LQDI or FTLS?
Over the past year, LQDI had a volatility of 4.61%, while FTLS experienced 7.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: LQDI or FTLS?
As of October 16, 2026, LQDI holds $66.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while FTLS manages $2.65 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
