LQDHvsTMNLETF Comparison
VS
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) belongs to the Alternatives segment. T. Rowe Price Long Municipal Income ETF (TMNL) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. LQDH's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, TMNL's top sector exposures are Municipal. LQDH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.44%, versus 0.26% for TMNL. LQDH is up 3.61% year-to-date (YTD) with -$893K in YTD flows. TMNL performs worse with -0.61% YTD performance, and +$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LQDH and TMNL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LQDH vs TMNL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LQDH TMNL | +1.30%-2.01% | +1.18%-3.38% | +3.61%-0.61% | +5.48%n/a | +23.10%n/a | +29.91%n/a |
| Flows | LQDH TMNL | +$32M- | +$60M- | -$893K+$1M | +$60M- | +$322M- | +$17M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LQDH TMNL | +1.85%+3.56% | +2.61%n/a | +3.42%n/a | +4.32%n/a |
| Max drawdown | LQDH TMNL | -0.79%-3.94% | -2.26%n/a | -4.48%n/a | -6.82%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LQDH TMNL | 60d74d | 82dn/a | 104dn/a | 485dn/a |
Trading data
LQDH | TMNL | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $93.00 | $48.41 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $92.89 | $48.51 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TMNL
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLQDH | TMNL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LQDH | TMNL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $93.00 | $48.41 |
| 1D performance | +0.12% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $576.51 M | $21.72 M |
| E/R | 0.44% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
LQDH | TMNL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | T. Rowe Price |
| Benchmark | BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 3146 | 52 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 27, 2014 | November 19, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LQDH
USA
87.25%
Other
12.75%
TMNL
USA
49.92%
Other
50.08%
Sectors
LQDH
Finance
31.19%
Technology
12.92%
Healthcare
9.33%
Energy
7.7%
Telecommunication.
7.57%
Other
31.29%
TMNL
Municipal
49.92%
Other
50.08%
Advertisement
Diversification
LQDH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.56%
TMNL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.52%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LQDH
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
6.61%
Anheuser-Busch, 4.9% 1feb2046, USD
0.18%
CVS Health, 5.05% 25mar2048, USD
0.16%
T-Mobile USA, 3.875% 15apr2030, USD
0.15%
Goldman Sachs, 6.75% 1oct2037, USD
0.14%
Meta Platforms, 4.875% 15nov2035, USD
0.14%
Amazon.com, 4.875% 13mar2036, USD
0.14%
Meta Platforms, 6.3% 15may2056, USD
0.13%
Space Exploration Technologies, 5.875% 15jul2036, USD
0.13%
Pfizer, 4.75% 19may2033, USD
0.13%
Anheuser-Busch, 4.7% 1feb2036, USD
0.13%
Boeing, 5.805% 1may2050, USD
0.13%
Pfizer, 5.3% 19may2053, USD
0.13%
Meta Platforms, 5.625% 15nov2055, USD
0.13%
Space Exploration Technologies, 5.65% 15jul2033, USD
0.13%
TMNL
New York Municipal Water Finance Authority, 5.25% 15jun2055, USD (2026)
4.70%
US42605KAB26
3.36%
US41423PDY07
3.07%
US914713W996
2.68%
New York Transitional Finance Authority, 5% 1may2051, USD (2026)
2.29%
Chesapeake Bay Bridge And Tunnel District, 5% 1jul2041, USD (2016)
2.25%
Maryland Economic Development Corp., 5.25% 30jun2052, USD (2022B)
2.03%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 6% 30jun2059, USD (2025)
1.88%
US249182LT15
1.84%
Salt Lake City Airport, 5.25% 1jul2053, USD (2023A)
1.82%
US574218T373
1.80%
North Carolina Turnpike Authority, 4% 1jan2039, USD
1.78%
New York Mortgage Agency, 3.4% 1oct2030, USD
1.75%
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, 5% 31dec2056, USD (2017)
1.65%
US57419TTP65
1.60%
Frequently asked questions about LQDH and TMNL
How have the LQDH and TMNL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, LQDH is up 3.61% year-to-date (YTD), while TMNL has lost -0.61%. That puts LQDH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LQDH or TMNL?
Year-to-date, the LQDH ETF saw -$893K in flows, compared to +$1M for TMNL.
Which ETF is bigger: LQDH or TMNL?
As of September 18, 2026, LQDH holds $576.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while TMNL manages $21.72 M.
What sectors do the LQDH and TMNL ETFs invest in?
LQDH leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, TMNL focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the LQDH ETF and TMNL ETF?
LQDH top holdings include BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, Anheuser-Busch, 4.9% 1feb2046, USD and CVS Health, 5.05% 25mar2048, USD. TMNL holds in its top three: New York Municipal Water Finance Authority, 5.25% 15jun2055, USD (2026), US42605KAB26 and US41423PDY07.
Which ETF is more diversified: LQDH or TMNL?
LQDH holds 3147 securities with 8.56% of its assets in the top 15. TMNL has 113 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.52%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
