New

ETF model portfolios designed for real investor needs. Discover →

Advertisement
Advertisement

LONZvsCMBSETF Comparison

ETF 1
LONZ

PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund

This fund is part of
US Aggregate Bonds
+0.03%
VS
ETF 2
CMBS

iShares CMBS ETF

This fund is part of
MBS & ABS
-0.04%

PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. LONZ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, CMBS's top sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Corporate and Finance. LONZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.73%, versus 0.25% for CMBS. LONZ is up 2.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$206M in YTD flows. CMBS performs worse with -0.43% YTD performance, and -$43M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LONZ and CMBS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

LONZ vs CMBS performance and flow charts

Performance

-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20.00.2%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Cumulative Flows

-20 M0 M20 M40 M60 MSep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 14

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
LONZ
CMBS
-0.88%+0.09%
+0.28%-1.04%
+2.38%-0.43%
+3.59%-0.13%
+21.78%+17.91%
n/a+3.80%
Flows
LONZ
CMBS
+$69M-$21M
+$101M-$28M
+$206M-$43M
+$52M-$58M
+$468M+$13M
--$271M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
LONZ
CMBS
+1.47%+2.68%
+1.61%+2.60%
+1.75%+3.56%
n/a+4.57%
Max drawdown
LONZ
CMBS
-1.11%-2.18%
-1.50%-2.79%
-2.85%-2.79%
n/a-14.68%
Max drawdown duration
LONZ
CMBS
24d52d
107d229d
102d229d
n/a1321d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
LONZ
CMBS
Last sale
10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
$48.77
$47.59
Previous close
10/15/2026
$48.78
$47.51
Consolidated volume
10/15/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

LONZ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
LONZ
CMBS
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LONZ
CMBS
Last price
$48.77
$47.59
1D performance
-0.03%
+0.17%
AuM$670.30 M$436.70 M
E/R0.73%0.25%
Characteristics
LONZ
CMBS
Management strategyActivePassive
ProviderPIMCOiShares
Benchmark-Bloomberg US CMBS ERISA Eligible Index
N° of holdings720
Asset class-Fixed Income
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateJune 8, 2022February 14, 2012
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

LONZ
Other
100%
CMBS
Other
100%

Sectors

LONZ
Other
100%
CMBS
Other
100%
Advertisement

Diversification

LONZ

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

18.43%
CMBS

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

12.36%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026
LONZ
US44988LAM90
1.61%
US74345HAL50
1.58%
US68163YAJ47
1.46%
XAC0787FAL67
1.32%
US22562QAB23
1.32%
US01881UAN54
1.31%
Meta Platforms, 6.581% 30may2049, USD
1.27%
US89364MCA09
1.17%
US57777YAG17
1.17%
US75915TAK88
1.12%
US67123SAB51
1.03%
US44332EAZ97
1.02%
US31556PAB31
1.02%
US96244UAM99
1.02%
US44413EAK47
1.02%
CMBS
Freddie Mac REMICS K117, 1.406% 25aug2030, USD (ABS, A2)
1.26%
US3137HCXK30
1.14%
US3137FTBM86
1.10%
US3137FPHK45
0.90%
US3136BMXZ61
0.87%
US3137HLJ526
0.86%
US3137HNN870
0.83%
US05555PAB85
0.73%
US3137HAAG19
0.72%
US3137HPUE10
0.71%
US3137FMTY89
0.70%
US22945DAG88
0.68%
US09661XAB47
0.64%
US3137HHHY05
0.62%
US05491UBD90
0.62%
Frequently asked questions about LONZ and CMBS

How have the LONZ and CMBS ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 16, 2026, LONZ is up 2.38% year-to-date (YTD), while CMBS has lost -0.43%. That puts LONZ better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LONZ or CMBS?

Year-to-date, the LONZ ETF saw +$206M in flows, compared to -$43M for CMBS.

Which ETF is more volatile: LONZ or CMBS?

Over the past year, LONZ had a volatility of 1.61%, while CMBS experienced 2.6%.

Which ETF is bigger: LONZ or CMBS?

As of October 16, 2026, LONZ holds $670.30 M in assets under management (AUM), while CMBS manages $436.70 M.

What are the top holdings of the LONZ ETF and CMBS ETF?

LONZ top holdings include US44988LAM90, US74345HAL50 and US68163YAJ47. CMBS holds in its top three: Freddie Mac REMICS K117, 1.406% 25aug2030, USD (ABS, A2), US3137HCXK30 and US3137FTBM86.

Which ETF is more diversified: LONZ or CMBS?

LONZ holds 198 securities with 18.43% of its assets in the top 15. CMBS has 451 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.36%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
ETF INVESTOR RESOURCES

Expert-Built ETF Portfolios, All in One Place

Don’t start from scratch. Discover ready-made ETF portfolios built by professionals to match different goals, timelines, and market views. Use them as inspiration or as a starting point for your own allocation.

Portfolio Builder