LMUBvsCMFETF Comparison
VS
iShares Long-Term National Muni Bond ETF (LMUB) and iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 2 sector exposures: Municipal and Non-Corporate. LMUB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.09%, versus 0.08% for CMF. LMUB is down -1.01% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.61B in YTD flows. CMF performs better with -0.7% YTD performance, and +$925M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LMUB and CMF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LMUB vs CMF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LMUB CMF | -1.54%-0.70% | -2.89%-1.56% | -1.01%-0.70% | +5.23%+3.22% | n/a+8.51% | n/a+1.25% |
| Flows | LMUB CMF | +$22M+$62M | +$30M+$291M | +$1.61B+$925M | +$1.61B+$1.27B | -+$2.42B | -+$2.98B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LMUB CMF | +3.82%+2.52% | +3.65%+2.41% | n/a+3.46% | n/a+3.45% |
| Max drawdown | LMUB CMF | -4.12%-2.39% | -4.12%-2.72% | n/a-5.18% | n/a-12.25% |
| Max drawdown duration | LMUB CMF | 57d57d | 57d184d | n/a275d | n/a1346d |
Trading data
LMUB | CMF | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.65 | $55.73 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $48.69 | $55.75 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 2, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LMUB | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LMUB | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.65 | $55.73 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $1.58 B | $4.60 B |
| E/R | 0.09% | 0.08% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LMUB
USA
57.19%
Other
42.81%
CMF
USA
61.5%
Other
38.5%
Sectors
LMUB
Municipal
52.49%
Other
47.51%
CMF
Municipal
61.5%
Other
38.5%
Diversification
LMUB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
12.95%
CMF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.91%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LMUB
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
4.70%
Massachusetts, 5% 1oct2052, USD (2023)
0.87%
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 5% 1dec2056, USD (2026)
0.64%
US64972JPQ57
0.63%
Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority, 5.25% 1jul2050, USD (2025A)
0.63%
US646039ZM26
0.62%
US70914P5R91
0.61%
State of Washington, 5% 1jun2046, USD (2026D)
0.57%
US882725DA91
0.56%
US452153HP77
0.55%
US64985TGH86
0.54%
US452153PC72
0.53%
US812643C289
0.51%
Multnomah School District №1J (OR), 4.5% 15jun2055, USD (2026)
0.49%
City of New York, 5.25% 1feb2050, USD (2025)
0.49%
CMF
Orange Water District, FRN 1aug2042, USD (2003A)
0.50%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2031, USD (2024)
0.47%
University of California, 5.5% 15may2040, USD
0.46%
US79905CAB90
0.43%
California Educational Facilities Authority, 5% 1may2045, USD
0.43%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2034, USD (2024A)
0.41%
US13077DUT70
0.41%
University of California, 5% 15may2036, USD (2025)
0.39%
US032556NJ70
0.39%
California, 5% 1mar2055, USD
0.38%
US4636324Q95
0.36%
California, 5.25% 1aug2032, USD
0.35%
East AWP Joint Powers Authority, 3.125% 1sep2026, USD (2024A)
0.32%
East Bay Municipal Utility District, 5% 1jun2039, USD (2026B)
0.31%
US842475M859
0.31%
Frequently asked questions about LMUB and CMF
How have the LMUB and CMF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, LMUB is down -1.01% year-to-date (YTD), while CMF has lost -0.7%. That puts CMF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LMUB or CMF?
Year-to-date, the LMUB ETF saw +$1.61B in flows, compared to +$925M for CMF.
Which ETF is more volatile: LMUB or CMF?
Over the past year, LMUB had a volatility of 3.65%, while CMF experienced 2.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: LMUB or CMF?
As of September 1, 2026, LMUB holds $1.58 B in assets under management (AUM), while CMF manages $4.60 B.
What sectors do the LMUB and CMF ETFs invest in?
LMUB leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, CMF focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the LMUB ETF and CMF ETF?
LMUB top holdings include BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash, Massachusetts, 5% 1oct2052, USD (2023) and Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 5% 1dec2056, USD (2026). CMF holds in its top three: Orange Water District, FRN 1aug2042, USD (2003A), Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2031, USD (2024) and University of California, 5.5% 15may2040, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: LMUB or CMF?
LMUB holds 758 securities with 12.95% of its assets in the top 15. CMF has 1640 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.91%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LMUB & CMF
Advertisement
