LITPvsREMXETF Comparison
VS
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) belongs to the Alternative Energy segment. VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is part of the Natural Resources segment. LITP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Utilities and Non-Corporate. In contrast, REMX's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Utilities. LITP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.58% for REMX. LITP is down -37.2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. REMX performs better with -27.92% YTD performance, and +$699M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LITP and REMX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LITP vs REMX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LITP REMX | -23.98%-24.48% | -29.03%-24.07% | -37.20%-27.92% | -19.76%-25.38% | -35.28%-7.93% | n/a-48.44% |
| Flows | LITP REMX | -+$4M | --$83M | +$5M+$699M | +$11M+$929M | +$28M+$1.67B | -+$1.49B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LITP REMX | +36.45%+33.39% | +45.15%+40.76% | +41.79%+35.86% | n/a+35.57% |
| Max drawdown | LITP REMX | -38.14%-33.38% | -57.30%-50.94% | -63.32%-50.94% | n/a-72.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | LITP REMX | 53d56d | 162d166d | 794d166d | n/a1659d |
Trading data
LITP | REMX | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $7.60 | $54.06 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $7.47 | $53.36 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LITP | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LITP | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $7.60 | $54.06 |
| 1D performance | +1.77% | +1.31% |
| AuM | $27.46 M | $1.53 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.58% |
Characteristics
LITP | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index | MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index |
| N° of holdings | 39 | 29 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | October 27, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LITP
Australia
41.9%
Canada
13.9%
China
12.75%
Chile
12.14%
USA
10.56%
Other
8.75%
REMX
China
29.99%
Australia
25.15%
USA
23.82%
Other
21.04%
Sectors
LITP
Non-Energy Materi.
96.34%
Other
3.66%
REMX
Non-Energy Materi.
96.13%
Other
3.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
LITP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
86.28%
REMX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.44%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
LITP
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
12.14%
PLS Group Ltd.
10.96%
Albemarle Corp.
10.09%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
8.39%
Liontown Ltd.
6.64%
IGO Ltd.
5.79%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
4.37%
Lithium Argentina AG
4.19%
Elevra Lithium Ltd.
4.09%
Lithium Americas Corp.
3.81%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
3.47%
Core Lithium Ltd.
3.43%
Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd.
3.39%
PMET Resources, Inc.
2.89%
Standard Lithium Ltd.
2.64%
REMX
PLS Group Ltd.
8.13%
Albemarle Corp.
8.06%
MP Materials Corp.
6.80%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
6.76%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.
6.53%
Almonty Industries, Inc.
5.73%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
5.72%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co., Ltd.
5.33%
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
5.08%
Lianyou Metals Co., Ltd.
4.80%
Iluka Resources Ltd.
3.78%
Shenghe Resources Holding Co., Ltd.
3.63%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
3.56%
Liontown Ltd.
3.08%
AMG Critical Materials NV
2.47%
Frequently asked questions about LITP and REMX
How have the LITP and REMX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, LITP is down -37.2% year-to-date (YTD), while REMX has lost -27.92%. That puts REMX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LITP or REMX?
Year-to-date, the LITP ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$699M for REMX.
Which ETF is more volatile: LITP or REMX?
Over the past year, LITP had a volatility of 45.15%, while REMX experienced 40.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: LITP or REMX?
As of October 16, 2026, LITP holds $27.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while REMX manages $1.53 B.
What sectors do the LITP and REMX ETFs invest in?
LITP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, REMX focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the LITP ETF and REMX ETF?
LITP top holdings include Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, PLS Group Ltd. and Albemarle Corp.. REMX holds in its top three: PLS Group Ltd., Albemarle Corp. and MP Materials Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: LITP or REMX?
LITP holds 39 securities with 86.28% of its assets in the top 15. REMX has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.44%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LITP & REMX
There's an ETF for That? Emerging Markets Without China
June 25, 2026
REMX
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
REMX
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
October 30, 2025
REMX
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
REMX
Advertisement
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
LITP
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Advertisement
