LITPvsREMXETF Comparison
VS
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) belongs to the Alternative Energy segment. VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is part of the Natural Resources segment. LITP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Utilities and Non-Corporate. In contrast, REMX's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Utilities. LITP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.58% for REMX. LITP is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. REMX performs better with 5.43% YTD performance, and +$748M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LITP and REMX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LITP vs REMX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LITP REMX | +19.21%+16.80% | -24.84%-22.42% | -1.84%+5.43% | +60.96%+28.85% | -8.21%+15.65% | n/a-24.16% |
| Flows | LITP REMX | -+$12M | -$4M-$34M | +$5M+$748M | +$13M+$1.48B | +$30M+$1.69B | -+$1.56B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LITP REMX | +45.20%+42.21% | +47.35%+42.70% | +41.61%+35.82% | n/a+35.71% |
| Max drawdown | LITP REMX | -39.11%-35.96% | -44.08%-40.08% | -67.97%-53.20% | n/a-72.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | LITP REMX | 88d87d | 113d114d | 853d758d | n/a1607d |
Trading data
LITP | REMX | |
Last sale | ||
| Previous close 08/28/2026 | ||
| Consolidated volume 08/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LITP | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
LITP | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | – |
| 1D performance | – | – |
| AuM | $42.93 M | $2.29 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.58% |
Characteristics
LITP | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index | MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index |
| N° of holdings | 37 | 29 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | October 27, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LITP
Australia
39.51%
China
13.63%
Canada
13.19%
Chile
12.32%
USA
10.96%
Other
10.38%
REMX
China
31.86%
Australia
24.73%
USA
22.48%
Other
20.93%
Sectors
LITP
Non-Energy Materi.
94.57%
Other
5.43%
REMX
Non-Energy Materi.
91.59%
Other
8.41%
Advertisement
Diversification
LITP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
85.7%
REMX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.11%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
LITP
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
12.32%
Albemarle Corp.
10.52%
PLS Group Ltd.
9.90%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
9.02%
Liontown Ltd.
6.15%
IGO Ltd.
5.38%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
4.61%
Lithium Argentina AG
4.44%
Elevra Lithium Ltd.
4.35%
Lithium Americas Corp.
4.23%
Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd.
3.77%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
3.24%
PMET Resources, Inc.
2.80%
Core Lithium Ltd.
2.55%
Standard Lithium Ltd.
2.42%
REMX
Albemarle Corp.
8.09%
PLS Group Ltd.
7.56%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.
7.50%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
6.84%
MP Materials Corp.
5.91%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
5.83%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co., Ltd.
5.67%
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
5.04%
Almonty Industries, Inc.
4.34%
TW0007610B14
4.25%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
3.91%
Shenghe Resources Holding Co., Ltd.
3.81%
Iluka Resources Ltd.
3.67%
Liontown Ltd.
3.03%
AMG Critical Materials NV
2.66%
Frequently asked questions about LITP and REMX
How have the LITP and REMX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 28, 2026, LITP is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD), while REMX has returned 5.43%. That puts REMX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LITP or REMX?
Year-to-date, the LITP ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$748M for REMX.
Which ETF is more volatile: LITP or REMX?
Over the past year, LITP had a volatility of 47.35%, while REMX experienced 42.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: LITP or REMX?
As of August 28, 2026, LITP holds $42.93 M in assets under management (AUM), while REMX manages $2.29 B.
What sectors do the LITP and REMX ETFs invest in?
LITP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, REMX focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the LITP ETF and REMX ETF?
LITP top holdings include Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, Albemarle Corp. and PLS Group Ltd.. REMX holds in its top three: Albemarle Corp., PLS Group Ltd. and China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: LITP or REMX?
LITP holds 39 securities with 85.7% of its assets in the top 15. REMX has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.11%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LITP & REMX
There's an ETF for That? Emerging Markets Without China
June 25, 2026
REMX
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
REMX
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
October 30, 2025
REMX
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
REMX
Advertisement
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
LITP
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Advertisement
